The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · cited 6×
“Based on previous research (Efklides, 2006, 2008; see also Efklides, 2001; Flavell, 1979; Salonen et al., 2005) the hypothesis was that metacognitive experiences would be present in the beginning of episodes of socially shared metacognition (Hypothesis 4).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995) · Computer Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5 · Cited by 2,274 · cited 1×
“In the same vein, Roschelle and Teasley (1995) regard a joint problem space as central to collaboration, that is, a shared knowledge structure supports problem-solving activity and integrates goals, description of the current problem state, awareness of available problemsolving actions and…”
BackgroundHigh-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?
Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001 · Cited by 466
Sociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation
Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008) · Advances in Motivation and Achievement · doi:10.1016/s0749-7423(08)15013-0 · Cited by 74
Cited by
Socially shared regulation of learning: a review.
Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000226 · Cited by 355
Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts
Hennessy, S., Rojas-Drummond, S., Higham, R., Márquez, A. M., Maine, F., Ríos, R. M., García-Carrión, R., Torreblanca, O., & Barrera, M. J. (2016) · Learning, Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001 · Cited by 348
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001 · Cited by 236
Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001 · Cited by 196
Iqbal, J., Hashmi, Z. F., Asghar, M. Z., & Abid, M. N. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01676-x · Cited by 82
What does physiological synchrony reveal about metacognitive experiences and group performance?
Dindar, M., Järvelä, S., & Haataja, E. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12981 · Cited by 70
Malmberg, J., Haataja, E., Seppänen, T., & Järvelä, S. (2019) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-019-09311-4 · Cited by 50
University Students’ Knowledge Construction during Face to Face Collaborative Writing
Nykopp, M., Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2014) · Writing as a Learning Activity · doi:10.1163/9789004265011_013 · Cited by 18
Breideband, T., Bush, J. B., Reitman, J. G., Rose, S., Weatherley, J., Penuel, W. R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00509-2 · Cited by 5
“…coordinated talk (Barron, 2000), co-construction (Azmitia & Montgomery, 1993; Forman & Kraker, 1985; Hatano, 1993; Hogan et al., 1999; Schwartz, 1995), co-regulation (Volet et al., 2009) and shared regulation (Iiskala et al., 2011; Roschelle & Teasley, 1995; Vau-ras et al., 2003), among others.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P.
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 379-393
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983919026
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
