Cited by 194Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Supporting Groups’ Emotion and Motivation Regulation during Collaborative Learning

Järvenoja, Hanna, Järvelä, Sanna, Malmberg, Jonna·2020·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.11.004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J.
Affiliations
University of Oulu (FI)
Corresponding author
Järvenoja, Hanna
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
70
Pages
101090
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771026009
Cited by
194
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5
FWCI
16.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
Funders
Finnish Academy (297686)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
emotion regulation, motivational regulation, cooperative learning, co-regulation, shared regulation, university students, mathematics learning, group work, emotional state, motivational states

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review