Cited by 57Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments

A phase I trial of the human double minute 2 inhibitor (MK-8242) in patients with refractory/recurrent acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)

Open access
Ravandi, Farhad, Gojo, Ivana, Patnaik, Mrinal M., Minden, Mark D., Kantarjian, Hagop, Johnson-Levonas, Amy O., Fancourt, Craig, Lam, Raymond +5 more·2016·Leukemia Research

Abstract

Objective Evaluate safety/tolerability/efficacy of MK-8242 in subjects with refractory/recurrent AML.Methods MK-8242 was dosed p.o. QD (30-250mg) or BID (120-250mg) for 7on/7off in 28-day cycle. Dosing was modified to 7on/14off, in 21-day cycle (210 or 300mg BID).Results 26 subjects enrolled (24 evaluable for response); 5/26 discontinued due to AEs. There were 7 deaths; 1 (fungal pneumonia due to marrow aplasia) possibly drug-related. With the 7on/7off regimen, 2 subjects had DLTs in the 250mg BID group (both bone marrow failure and prolonged cytopenia). With the 7on/14off, no DLTs were observed in 210mg BID or 300mg BID (doses>300mg not tested). Best responses were: 1/24 PR (11 weeks;120mg QD, 7on/7off); 1/24 CRi (2 weeks;210mg BID, 7on/14off); 1/24 morphologic leukemia-free state (4 weeks; 250mg BID, 7on/7off). PK on Day7 at 210mg BID revealed AUC0-12h 8.7μM·h,Cmax 1.5μM (n=5,Tmax, 2-6h),T1/2 7.9h, CLss/F 28.8L/h, and Vss/F 317L.Conclusions The 7on/14off regimen showed a more favorable safety profile; no MTD was established. Efficacy was seen using both regimens providing impetus for further study of HDM2 inhibitors in subjects with AML.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leukres.2016.07.004

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MK-8242 exhibited a strong inhibitory effect on wild-type PPTP cells with an IC50 value of 0.07 μM, but had weak inhibitory effects on TP53-mutant PPTP cells with an IC50 value greater than 10 μM, indicating a selectivity of more than 100 times.

    “It exhibited a strong inhibitory effect on wild-type PPTP cells with an IC50 value of 0.07 μM, but had weak inhibitory effects on TP53-mutant PPTP cells with an IC50 value greater than10 μM), indicating a selectivity of more than 100 times.”
  • In vivo studies demonstrated that MK-8242 delayed tumor growth by a factor of two or more in 10 of 17 solid tumor xenografts containing wild-type TP53, but had no effect on osteosarcoma xenografts with low TP53 expression.

    “In vivo studies demonstrated that MK-8242 delayed tumor growth by a factor of two or more in 10 of 17 solid tumor xenografts containing wild-type TP53, but had no effect on osteosarcoma xenografts with low TP53 expression.377–380”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ravandi, F., Gojo, I., Patnaik, M. M., Minden, M. D., Kantarjian, H., Johnson-Levonas, A. O., Fancourt, C., Lam, R., Jones, M. B., Knox, C. D., Rose, S., Patel, P. S., & Tibes, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Ravandi, Farhad
Venue
Leukemia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
48
Pages
92-100
ISSN
0145-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2488647697
Cited by
57
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Leukemia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Merck
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Keywords
acute myeloid leukemia, refractory leukemia, leukemia relapse, dose-limiting toxicity, pharmacokinetics, bone marrow failure, cytopenia, drug safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cytarabine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Enzyme Inhibitors, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Survival Analysis, Salvage Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review