The DOI matches its Crossref record; 358 of the 358 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of spatial memory in mice
Open accessAbstract
Improvements in health care have greatly increased life span in the United States. The focus is now shifting from physical well-being to improvement in mental well-being or maintenance of cognitive function in old age. It is known that elderly people suffer from cognitive impairment, even without neurodegeneration, as a part of ‘normal aging’. This ‘age-associated memory impairment’ (AAMI), can have a devastating impact on the social and economic life of an individual as well as the society. Scientists have been experimenting to find methods to prevent the memory loss associated with aging. The major factor involved in these experiments is the use of animal models to assess hippocampal-based spatial memory. This review describes the different types of memory including hippocampal-based memory that is vulnerable to aging. A detailed overview of various behavioral paradigms used to assess spatial memory including the T-maze, radial maze, Morris water maze, Barnes maze and others is presented. The review also describes the molecular basis of memory in hippocampus called as ‘long-term potentiation’. The advantages and limitations of the behavioral models in assessing memory and the link to the long-term potentiation are discussed. This review should assist investigators in choosing suitable methods to assess spatial memory in mice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Chandra, R. K. (2001) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/s0899-9007(01)00610-4 · Cited by 121
RetractedThe magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,161
A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus
Bliss, T. V. P., & Collingridge, G. L. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361031a0 · Cited by 11,566
Hebb, D. O. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612403 · Cited by 9,825
(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system
CHOI, D. (1988) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(88)90162-6 · Cited by 7,972
Bliss, T. V. P., & Gardner‐Medwin, A. R. (1973) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010274 · Cited by 7,437
LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS
Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11 · Cited by 7,322
Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat
Morris, R. (1984) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4 · Cited by 7,180
Cited by
Jiang, J., Zhu, Q., Gendron, T. F., Saberi, S., McAlonis-Downes, M., Seelman, A., Stauffer, J. E., Jafar-nejad, P., Drenner, K., Schulte, D., et al. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.006 · Cited by 536
Bifidobacteria modulate cognitive processes in an anxious mouse strain
Savignac, H. M., Tramullas, M., Kiely, B., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2015) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.02.044 · Cited by 365
Guzior, N., Wi.eckowska, A., Panek, D., & Malawska, B. (2014) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867321666141106122628 · Cited by 323
Ohland, C. L., Kish, L., Bell, H., Thiesen, A., Hotte, N., Pankiv, E., & Madsen, K. L. (2013) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.008 · Cited by 273
Senatorov, V. V., Friedman, A. R., Milikovsky, D. Z., Ofer, J., Saar-Ashkenazy, R., Charbash, A., Jahan, N., Chin, G., Mihaly, E., Lin, J. M., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw8283 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, S., Rakoczy, S., & Brown-Borg, H.
- Venue
- Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 17-18
- Pages
- 521-536
- ISSN
- 0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045007926
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 358
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of spatial memory in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.lfs.2010.09.004
- The paper
- Sharma, S., Rakoczy, S., & Brown-Borg, H. (2010). Assessment of spatial memory in mice. Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2010.09.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.