The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinct pharmacology and metabolism of K2 synthetic cannabinoids compared to Δ9-THC: Mechanism underlying greater toxicity?
Open accessAbstract
K2 or Spice products are emerging drugs of abuse that contain synthetic cannabinoids (SCBs). Although assumed by many teens and first time drug users to be a “safe” and “legal” alternative to marijuana, many recent reports indicate that SCBs present in K2 produce toxicity not associated with the primary psychoactive component of marijuana, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC). This mini-review will summarize recent evidence that use of K2 products poses greater health risks relative to marijuana, and suggest that distinct pharmacological properties and metabolism of SCBs relative to Δ9-THC may contribute to the observed toxicity. Studies reviewed will indicate that in contrast to partial agonist properties of Δ9-THC typically observed in vitro, SCBs in K2 products act as full cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) and type 2 (CB2R) agonists in both cellular assays and animal studies. Furthermore, unlike Δ9-THC metabolism, several SCB metabolites retain high affinity for, and exhibit a range of intrinsic activities at, CB1 and CB2Rs. Finally, several reports indicate that although quasi-legal SCBs initially evaded detection and legal consequences, these presumed “advantages” have been limited by new legislation and development of product and human testing capabilities. Collectively, evidence reported in this mini-review suggests that K2 products are neither safe nor legal alternatives to marijuana. Instead, enhanced toxicity of K2 products relative to marijuana, perhaps resulting from the combined actions of a complex mixture of different SCBs present and their active metabolites that retain high affinity for CB1 and CB2Rs, highlights the inherent danger that may accompany use of these substances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE HUMAN INTESTINAL CYTOCHROME P450 “PIE”
Paine, M. F., Hart, H. L., Ludington, S. S., Haining, R. L., Rettie, A. E., & Zeldin, D. C. (2006) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.105.008672 · Cited by 870
Neubig, R. R., Spedding, M., Kenakin, T., & Christopoulos, A. (2003) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.55.4.4 · Cited by 665
Hirvonen, J., Goodwin, R. S., Li, C.-T., Terry, G. E., Zoghbi, S. S., Morse, C., Pike, V. W., Volkow, N. D., Huestis, M. A., & Innis, R. B. (2012) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2011.82 · Cited by 587
Cannabis: pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans
ADAMS, I. B., & MARTIN, B. R. (1996) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1996.911115852.x · Cited by 570
The cannabinoid system and immune modulation
Klein, T. W., Newton, C., Larsen, K., Lu, L., Perkins, I., Nong, L., & Friedman, H. (2003) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0303101 · Cited by 524
Seely, K. A., Lapoint, J., Moran, J. H., & Fattore, L. (2012) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.04.017 · Cited by 465
Self-citationBeyond THC: The New Generation of Cannabinoid Designer Drugs
Fattore, L., & Fratta, W. (2011) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00060 · Cited by 443
Brain cannabinoid CB2 receptors modulate cocaine's actions in mice
Xi, Z.-X., Peng, X.-Q., Li, X., Song, R., Zhang, H.-Y., Liu, Q.-R., Yang, H.-J., Bi, G.-H., Li, J., & Gardner, E. L. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2874 · Cited by 397
Functional interaction between opioid and cannabinoid receptors in drug self-administration.
Navarro, M., Carrera, M. R. A., Fratta, W., Valverde, O., Cossu, G., Fattore, L., Chowen, J. A., Gómez, R., del Arco, I., Villanúa, M. A., et al. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-14-05344.2001 · Cited by 378
Tanda, G., Munzar, P., & Goldberg, S. R. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/80577 · Cited by 345
Cited by
Novel halogenated derivates of JWH-018: behavioral and binding studies in mice
Vigolo, A., Ossato, A., Trapella, C., Vincenzi, F., Rimondo, C., Seri, C., Varani, K., Serpelloni, G., & Marti, M. (2015) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.02.008 · Cited by 91
Toxicity of Synthetic Cannabinoids in K2/Spice: A Systematic Review
de Oliveira, M. C., Vides, M. C., Lassi, D. L. S., Torales, J., Ventriglio, A., Bombana, H. S., Leyton, V., Périco, C. D. A.-M., Negrão, A. B., Malbergier, A., et al. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13070990 · Cited by 61
Barbieri, M., Ossato, A., Canazza, I., Trapella, C., Borelli, A. C., Beggiato, S., Rimondo, C., Serpelloni, G., Ferraro, L., & Marti, M. (2016) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.06.027 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Fantegrossi, W. E., Moran, J. H., Radominska-Pandya, A., & Prather, P. L.
- Venue
- Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-54
- ISSN
- 0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041841378
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 30.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct pharmacology and metabolism of K2 synthetic cannabinoids compared to Δ9-THC: Mechanism underlying greater toxicity? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.lfs.2013.09.017
- The paper
- Fantegrossi, W. E., Moran, J. H., Radominska-Pandya, A., & Prather, P. L. (2014). Distinct pharmacology and metabolism of K2 synthetic cannabinoids compared to Δ9-THC: Mechanism underlying greater toxicity? Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2013.09.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
