Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 141 of the 141 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CRISPR-Cas9 system: A new-fangled dawn in gene editing

Gupta, Darshana, Bhattacharjee, Oindrila, Mandal, Drishti, Sen, Madhab Kumar, Dey, Dhritiman, Dasgupta, Adhiraj, Kazi, Tawsif Ahmed, Gupta, Rahul, Sinharoy, Senjuti, Acharya, Krishnendu, Chattopadhyay, Dhrubajyoti, Ravichandiran, V., Roy, Syamal, Ghosh, Dipanjan·2019·Life Sciences

Abstract

Till date, only three techniques namely Zinc Finger Nuclease (ZFN), Transcription-Activator Like Effector Molecules (TALEN) and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-CRISPR-Associated 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) are available for targeted genome editing. CRISPR-Cas system is very efficient, fast, easy and cheap technique for achieving knock-out gene in the cell. CRISPR-Cas9 system refurbishes the targeted genome editing approach into a more expedient and competent way, thus facilitating proficient genome editing through embattled double-strand breaks in approximately any organism and cell type. The off-target effects of CRISPR Cas system has been circumnavigated by using paired nickases. Moreover, CRISPR-Cas9 has been used effectively for numerous purposes, like knock-out of a gene, regulation of endogenous gene expression, live-cell labelling of chromosomal loci, edition of single-stranded RNA and high-throughput gene screening. The execution of the CRISPR-Cas9 system has amplified the number of accessible scientific substitutes for studying gene function, thus enabling generation of CRISPR-based disease models. Even though many mechanistic questions are left behind to be answered and the system is not yet fool-proof i.e., a number of challenges are yet to be addressed, the employment of CRISPR-Cas9-based genome engineering technologies will increase our understanding to disease processes and their treatment in the near future. In this review we have discussed the history of CRISPR-Cas9, its mechanism for genome editing and its application in animal, plant and protozoan parasites. Additionally, the pros and cons of CRISPR-Cas9 and its potential in therapeutic application have also been detailed here.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116636

Cites

141 of 141 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 141 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Gupta, D., Bhattacharjee, O., Mandal, D., Sen, M. K., Dey, D., Dasgupta, A., Kazi, T. A., Gupta, R., Sinharoy, S., Acharya, K., Chattopadhyay, D., Ravichandiran, V., Roy, S., & Ghosh, D.
Venue
Life Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
232
Pages
116636
ISSN
0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2960163646
Cited by
323
References
141
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CRISPR-Cas9 system: A new-fangled dawn in gene editing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116636
The paper
Gupta, D., Bhattacharjee, O., Mandal, D., Sen, M. K., Dey, D., Dasgupta, A., Kazi, T. A., Gupta, R., Sinharoy, S., Acharya, K., Chattopadhyay, D., Ravichandiran, V., Roy, S., & Ghosh, D. (2019). CRISPR-Cas9 system: A new-fangled dawn in gene editing. Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116636

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.