Cited by 18Gut microbiota and healthCircadian rhythm and melatoninGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The impact of a western diet on gut microbiota and circadian rhythm: A comprehensive systematic review of in vivo preclinical evidence

Moreira Gobis, Melissa de Lourdes, Goulart de Souza-Silva, Thaiany, de Almeida Paula, Hudsara Aparecida·2024·Life Sciences

Abstract

Aims Here, we present a systematic review that compiles in vivo experimental data regarding the effect of the WD on the gut microbiota and its impact on the circadian rhythm. Additionally, we reviewed studies evaluating the combined effects of WD and circadian cycle disruption on gut microbiota and circadian cycle markers. Materials and methods The original studies indexed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were screened according to the PRISMA strategy. Key findings Preclinical studies revealed that WD triggers circadian rhythmicity disruption, reduces the alpha-diversity of the microbiota and favors the growth of bacterial groups that are detrimental to intestinal homeostasis, such as Clostridaceae, Enterococcus, Parasutterella and Proteobacteria. When the WD is combined with circadian clock disruption, gut dysbiosis become more pronounced. Reduced cycling of Per3, Rev-erb and CLOCK in the intestine, which are related to dysregulation of lipid metabolism and potential metabolic disease, was observed. Significance In conclusion, current evidence supports the potential of WD to trigger microbiota dysregulation, disrupt the biological clock, and increase susceptibility to metabolic disorders and potentially chronic diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.122741

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alterations in gut microbiota composition affect metabolic regulation, microbial metabolite production, and inflammation, potentially predisposing individuals to metabolic, liver, and inflammatory disorders.

    “This, in turn, affects metabolic regulation, microbial metabolite production, and inflammation, potentially predisposing individuals to metabolic, liver, and inflammatory disorders [99].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreira Gobis, M. D. L., Goulart de Souza-Silva, T., & de Almeida Paula, H. A.
Venue
Life Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
349
Pages
122741
ISSN
0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4398223992
Cited by
18
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Western diet, gut microbiota, circadian rhythm, circadian rhythm disruption, dysbiosis, microbial diversity, Enterococcus, Parasutterella, Proteobacteria, Per3, REV-ERB, clocks, metabolic disorders, obesity, insulin resistance, hypercholesterolemia, short-chain fatty acids, pathobionts
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Metabolic Diseases, Dysbiosis, Diet, Western

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review