The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The development of academic procrastination in first-year secondary education students: The link with metacognitive self-regulation, self-efficacy, and effort regulation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,447
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 · Cited by 10,647
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 · Cited by 3,807
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0026838 · Cited by 3,646 · cited 2×
“Students with high effort regulation will exhibit persistence when working on a task, whereas students with low effort regulation are more likely to quit before finishing their work (Pintrich, 2004; Richardson et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4279530 · Cited by 3,570
Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents
Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (2006) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-750-3 · Cited by 3,544
Steel, P. (2007) · Psychological bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65 · Cited by 3,417 · cited 12×
“been even described as an endemic phenomenon (Steel, 2007), with prevalence rates frequently reported between 50% to 70% and occasionally even higher (Janssen, 2015).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialA Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students
Pintrich, P. R. (2004) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x · Cited by 3,269
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Owens, 2000, Academic procrastination of adolescents in English and mathematics: Gender and personality variations, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 111
- Sims, 2014, 9(2), 147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–125 of 125
الشافي, إ. ا. م. ع., الزهار, ن. ع., الباقي, س. م. ع., & لاشین, ث. ی. (2021) · مجلة دراسات تربوية واجتماعية · doi:10.21608/jsu.2021.215457
Chinese undergraduate students' motivation profiles: Identification and significance
Gao, J. (2019) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17142695
Students' Procrastination Behavior on Their Online AssessmentsPreprint
Apas, P. D. D., & Ondayo, J. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4097821
الشهري, ع. ا. س. (2022) · المجلة التربوية لکلية التربية بسوهاج · doi:10.21608/edusohag.2022.270094
(2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-18750-6.00028-6
Salehi, S. M., Yousefi, N., & Moradi, O. (2022) · journal of Adolescent and Youth Psychological Studies · doi:10.52547/jspnay.3.3.411
The effect of self-efficacy on students’ critical thinking skills in mathematics subjects
Kintoko, Waluya, S. B., & Asikin, M. (2023) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0143621
Interrelationship of Psychotherapy, Psychocorrection and Psychoconsultation
Matiash-Zaiats, L., Степаненко, І., Kryukova, O., Horetska, O., Rodina, N., & Hrek, O. (2023) · BRAIN BROAD RESEARCH IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE · doi:10.18662/brain/14.3/467
Salehi, S. M., Yousefi, N., & Moradi, O. (2023) · Journal of Assessment and Research in Applied Counseling · doi:10.61838/kman.jarac.5.3.13
Sepehri, S., Morovati, Z., Mollajegh, R. R., & Jadidi, H. (2023) · Journal of Assessment and Research in Applied Counseling · doi:10.61838/kman.jarac.5.4.4
Mahvash, M., Yamini, M., & Mahdian, H. (2024) · doi:10.61838/kman.ijes.7.1.2
Ferraz, A. S., dos Santos, A. A. A., Noronha, A. P. P., & Almeida, L. S. (2024) · Acta Colombiana de Psicología · doi:10.14718/acp.2024.27.2.10
Examining Procrastination as a Function of Self-Regulation in Grade 7 and 10 StudentsPreprint
Tullo, L. W., Peery, W. S., & Scurlock, D. L. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5064584 · Cited by 1
Kafah, A. K. N., Firdaus, F. M., & Artobatama, I. (2025) · Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar · doi:10.23887/jisd.v8i3.67485
Psychologie der Schülerpersönlichkeit
Donat, M., Rüprich, C., & Dalbert, C. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-45042-7_6
Keyvan, K., Marashian, F. S., & Bozorgi, Z. D. (2025) · Educational research in medical sciences · doi:10.5812/ermsj-160658
Shi, Y., Yu-peng, L., & Yu, Z. (2025) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941251351232 · Cited by 3
Nuryadi, N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Suyitno, H., & Kharisudin, I. (2025) · Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal · doi:10.25217/0020258684000
대학운동선수의 생성형 AI 활용도와 학업적 자기효능감, 학업스트레스 및 학업지연행동, 학업성취도 간의 구조적 관계*
서, 효., & 이, 정. (2025) · 한국체육학회지 · doi:10.23949/kjpe.2025.9.64.5.24
Cheng, P. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107278
DAĞGÖL, G. D. (2026) · Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.46778/goputeb.1871746
Staying on time and on task: How task sequencing and task timing prompts impact open-ended learning
Coleman, J., Gavarkovs, A. G., & Brydges, R. (2026) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2026.2743046
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziegler, N., & Opdenakker, M.-C.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Ziegler, Niklas
- Venue
- Learning and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 71-82
- ISSN
- 1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799975749
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Keywords
- academic procrastination, metacognitive self-regulation, self-efficacy, effort regulation, first-year secondary students, developmental trajectories, early intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review