The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Configurations of firm-level value capture in coopetition
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The dualism of collaboration and competition in coopetition arrangements is an enabler but also, a limitation to firm-level value capture. With the assumption that firms may have different alignments for value capture, we employ a configurational approach. A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), based on a sample of 222 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), finds configurations of consistently high and low firm-level value capture. In their pursuit of an above-average value capture, SMEs can focus on value creation in the innovation or the market domain. Commonalities related to market overlap are a necessary condition for high value capture in coopetitive arrangements. A formal coopetition strategy and past coopetition experiences underlie dissimilar configurations concerning SMEs’ age and size. Formal coopetition strategy also triggers value capture only for mature SMEs. Instead, small SMEs can achieve high value capture in leveraging their coopetition experiences. However, solely relying on coopetition experiences without establishing a coopetition strategy characterizes most dysfunctional value capture configurations of SMEs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316679252 · Cited by 1,099
Heimeriks, K. H., & Duysters, G. (2007) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00639.x · Cited by 530
Lee, Y., & Colarelli O'Connor, G. (2003) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.t01-1-201002 · Cited by 348
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2014) · Oxford Handbooks Online · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.013.007 · Cited by 305
Cited by
Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization
Eller, R., Alford, P., Kallmünzer, A., & Peters, M. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.004 · Cited by 837
Necessary condition analysis (NCA): review of research topics and guidelines for good practice
Dul, J., Hauff, S., & Bouncken, R. B. (2023) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-023-00628-x · Cited by 325
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V., & Kraus, S.
- Venue
- Long Range Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101869
- ISSN
- 0024-6301 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2916422090
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 29.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Configurations of firm-level value capture in coopetition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.02.002
- The paper
- Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V., & Kraus, S. (2020). Configurations of firm-level value capture in coopetition. Long Range Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.02.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.