The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of beta-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes containing essential oils (trans-cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, cinnamon bark, and clove bud extracts) for antimicrobial delivery applications
Open accessAbstract
This study aimed to elucidate the physico-chemical characteristics of EO–BCD inclusion complexes and their resulting antimicrobial activity. Cinnamon bark extract, trans-cinnamaldehyde, clove bud extract, eugenol, and a 2:1 (trans-cinnamaldehyde:eugenol) mixture were microencapsulated by the freeze-drying method. EO–BCD complexes were characterized for particle size, morphology, polydispersity index, entrapment efficiency, and phase solubility. All particles showed a spherical shape, smooth surface, no significant differences in size distribution and strong tendency to agglomerate. The entrapment efficiencies ranged from 41.7 to 84.7%, where pure compounds were higher (p < 0.05) than extracts. The oils and their BCD complexes were analyzed for their antimicrobial activity against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 and Listeria innocua. All antimicrobials effectively inhibited bacterial growth within the concentration range tested, except free eugenol. The EO–BCD complexes were able to inhibit both bacterial strains at lower active compound concentrations than free oils, likely due to their increased water solubility that led to increased contact between pathogens and essential oils. The cinnamon bark and clove bud extract BCD complexes were the most powerful antimicrobials, despite showing the lowest entrapment efficiencies amongst the oils. Results suggest that the application of these antimicrobial complexes in food systems may be effective at inhibiting pathogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review
Burt, S. (2004) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022 · Cited by 10,488
Antibacterial activity of some essential oil components against five foodborne pathogens
Kim, J., Marshall, M. R., & Wei, C.-I. (1995) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf00059a013 · Cited by 892
Activity and mechanisms of action of selected biocidal agents on Gram-positive and-negative bacteria
Walsh, S. E., Maillard, J.-Y., Russell, A. D., Catrenich, C. E., Charbonneau, D. L., & Bartolo, R. G. (2003) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01825.x · Cited by 527
Cited by
Radünz, M., da Trindade, M. L. M., Camargo, T. M., Radünz, A. L., Borges, C. D., Gandra, E. A., & Helbig, E. (2019) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.173 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill, L. E., Gomes, C., & Taylor, T. M.
- Venue
- LWT - Food Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-93
- ISSN
- 0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059942781
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of beta-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes containing essential oils (trans-cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, cinnamon bark, and clove bud extracts) for antimicrobial delivery applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.11.011
- The paper
- Hill, L. E., Gomes, C., & Taylor, T. M. (2013). Characterization of beta-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes containing essential oils (trans-cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, cinnamon bark, and clove bud extracts) for antimicrobial delivery applications. LWT - Food Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.11.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.