Cited by 894Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityInsect Pest Control StrategiesAntimicrobial agents and applications

Antibacterial activity of some essential oil components against five foodborne pathogens

Kim, Jeongmok, Marshall, Maurice R., Wei, Cheng-i·1995·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTAntibacterial activity of some essential oil components against five foodborne pathogensJeongmok Kim, Maurice R. Marshall, and Cheng-i WeiCite this: J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 11, 2839–2845Publication Date (Print):November 1, 1995Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 November 1995https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf00059a013https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00059a013research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views5392Altmetric-Citations631LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf00059a013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Essential oils are generally most effective, with some exceptions, against Gram-positive microorganisms.

    “This could explain why EOs are generally most effective, with some exceptions [67], against Gram-positive microorganisms.”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [67]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J., Marshall, M. R., & Wei, C.-I.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
1995-11
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
2839-2845
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W1973605014
Cited by
892
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 46
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
essential oil constituents, antibacterial activity, foodborne pathogens, antimicrobial food preservatives, food safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review