The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomics in marine monitoring: New opportunities for assessing marine health status
Open accessAbstract
This viewpoint paper explores the potential of genomics technology to provide accurate, rapid, and cost efficient observations of the marine environment. The use of such approaches in next generation marine monitoring programs will help achieve the goals of marine legislation implemented world-wide. Genomic methods can yield faster results from monitoring, easier and more reliable taxonomic identification, as well as quicker and better assessment of the environmental status of marine waters. A summary of genomic methods that are ready or show high potential for integration into existing monitoring programs is provided (e.g. qPCR, SNP based methods, DNA barcoding, microarrays, metagenetics, metagenomics, transcriptomics). These approaches are mapped to existing indicators and descriptors and a series of case studies is presented to assess the cost and added value of these molecular techniques in comparison with traditional monitoring systems. Finally, guidelines and recommendations are suggested for how such methods can enter marine monitoring programs in a standardized manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transcriptome genetics using second generation sequencing in a Caucasian population
Montgomery, S. B., Sammeth, M., Gutierrez-Arcelus, M., Lach, R. P., Ingle, C., Nisbett, J., Guigo, R., & Dermitzakis, E. T. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08903 · Cited by 797
Hajibabaei, M., Shokralla, S., Zhou, X., Singer, G. A. C., & Baird, D. J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017497 · Cited by 584
Zhou, X., Adamowicz, S. J., Jacobus, L. M., DeWalt, R. E., & Hebert, P. D. (2009) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-30 · Cited by 153
Cited by
Quality assessment of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis): comparison between commercial and wild types
De Witte, B., Devriese, L., Bekaert, K., Hoffman, S., Vandermeersch, G., Cooreman, K., & Robbens, J. (2014) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.006 · Cited by 787
Aylagas, E., Borja, Á., & Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, N. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090529 · Cited by 182
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourlat, S. J., Borja, A., Gilbert, J., Taylor, M. I., Davies, N., Weisberg, S. B., Griffith, J. F., Lettieri, T., Field, D., Benzie, J., Glöckner, F. O., Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, N., Faith, D. P., Bean, T. P., & Obst, M.
- Venue
- Marine Pollution Bulletin
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-31
- ISSN
- 0025-326X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160554582
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
