Cited by 787Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Quality assessment of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis): comparison between commercial and wild types

De Witte, B., Devriese, L., Bekaert, K., Hoffman, S., Vandermeersch, G., Cooreman, K., Robbens, J.·2014·Marine Pollution Bulletin

Abstract

This study compared species identity, microplastics, chemical and microbial contamination between consumption mussels and wild type mussels, collected at Belgian department stores and Belgian groynes and quaysides, respectively. Species identification based on genetic analysis showed a high number of Mytilus (M.) edulis compared to M. galloprovincialis and M. edulis/galloprovincialis hybrid mussels. The number of total microplastics varied from 2.6 to 5.1 fibres/10 g of mussel. A higher prevalence of orange fibres at quaysides is related to fisheries activities. Chemical contamination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorobiphenyls could be related to industrial activities and water turbidity, with maximum concentrations at the quayside of port Zeebrugge. The inverse was noted for Escherichia coli contamination, which was relatively low at Zeebrugge quayside with a total count of 3.9 × 10(2)CFU/100 g tissue, due to limited agricultural effluents. Results of this complementary analysis stress the importance of integrated monitoring and quality assessment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.006

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Witte, B., Devriese, L., Bekaert, K., Hoffman, S., Vandermeersch, G., Cooreman, K., & Robbens, J.
Affiliations
Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek (BE)
Venue
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
146-155
ISSN
0025-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080822092
Cited by
787
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 14
FWCI
20.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee
  • Interreg
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
Mytilus edulis, Mytilus galloprovincialis, species identification, microplastics, chemical pollution, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, Escherichia coli, microbial contamination, bycatch, food quality assessment, Zeebrugge
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Animals, Wild, Environmental Monitoring, Fisheries, Food Contamination, Geography, Netherlands, Plastics, Polychlorinated Biphenyls, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Quality Control, Shellfish, Mytilus edulis, Limit of Detection, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review