Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reducing microplastics from facial exfoliating cleansers in wastewater through treatment versus consumer product decisions

Chang, Michelle·2015·Marine Pollution Bulletin

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.10.074

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Arthur, 2009, Proceedings of the international research workshop on the occurrence, effects, and fate of microplastic marine debris
  2. Arthur, 2011, Proceedings of the second research workshop on microplastic debris
  3. Carpenter, 1972, Polystyrene spherules in coastal waters, Science, 178, 749, 10.1126/science.178.4062.749 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Claessens, 2013, New techniques for the detection of microplastics in sediments and field collected organisms, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 70, 227, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Derraik, 2002, The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 44, 842, 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00220-5 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Decker, 2012, Over-the-counter acne treatments: a review, Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 5, 36
  7. Draelos, 2005, Reexamining methods of facial cleansing, Cosmet. Dermatol., 18, 172
  8. Engler, 2012, The complex interaction between marine debris and toxic chemicals in the ocean, Environmental Science and Toxicology., 46, 12302
  9. Fendall, 2009, Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: microplastics in facial cleansers, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 58, 1225, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.04.025 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Final report on the safety assessment of polyethylene, 2007, Int. J. Toxicol., 26, 115
  11. Graham, 2009, Deposit- and suspension-feeding sea cucumbers (Echinodermata) ingest plastic fragments, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 368, 22, 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.09.007 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Mills, 1979, Evaluation of abrasives in acne therapy, Cutis, 23, 704
  13. Moore, 2001, A comparison of plastic and plankton in the North Pacific Central Gyre, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 42, 1297, 10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00114-X · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rosette, 2012, Packaging, cosmetics and pharmaceutical, Kirk-Othmer Encycl. Chem. Technol., 1
  15. Teuten, 2007, Potential for plastics to transport hydrophobic contaminants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 7759, 10.1021/es071737s · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Chang, M.
Venue
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
330-333
ISSN
0025-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2196474351
Cited by
265
References
3
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
UC Berkeley's Environmental Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reducing microplastics from facial exfoliating cleansers in wastewater through treatment versus consumer product decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.10.074
The paper
Chang, M. (2015). Reducing microplastics from facial exfoliating cleansers in wastewater through treatment versus consumer product decisions. Marine Pollution Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.10.074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.