Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Worldwide actions against plastic pollution from microbeads and microplastics in cosmetics focusing on European policies. Has the issue been handled effectively?

Anagnosti, Lamprini, Varvaresou, Athanasia, Pavlou, Panagoula, Protopapa, Evangelia, Carayanni, Vilelmine·2021·Marine Pollution Bulletin

Abstract

Microbeads are solid primary microplastics < 5 mm in diameter that are added to cosmetic products for cleansing and/or exfoliation of the skin. After use, they are discharged into the drain and end up in Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs), from which they can escape into waters. Once disposed, there is no efficient method of recovery and the environmental conditions do not allow full biodegradation. Focusing mainly on the possible effect of microbeads on the environment and the human health, and taking into account that there have always been alternatives with similar cost, scientists suggested banning microbeads from cosmetic products. Despite the increasing knowledge on the microplastics' effects, the pressure from non-governmental organizations (NGO's) and the increasing public concern, few European and other countries worldwide have taken legislative steps against microbeads, and even fewer against other microplastics used in cosmetic products, mainly because it is a common belief that cosmetic industries responded massively to the call for a phase-out. Although EU acted soon after scientists focused on microbeads' effects by restricting cosmetics with microbeads to bare the EU Ecolabel in 2014, there is still no European-wide ban, which will probably take place as of 2022. Present study offers a thorough literature review on the presence of microbeads in cosmetics up to date, focusing primarily on the actions against their use, and questioning whether future pollution from microbeads or/and microplastics in cosmetics has been successfully handled.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111883

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 116 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Anagnosti, 2020, Microplastics in cosmetics, Epitheorese Klin. Farmakol. Farmakokinet., 38, 79
  2. Cosmetics Europe, 2018, ECHA workshop 30–31st May 2018 intentionally added microplastics to products break-out session: cosmetics
  3. Drohmann, 2018, Regulating microplastics: the global status on microbeads control legislation in cosmetics & personal care products, Int. Chem. Regul. Law Rev., 2, 79
  4. Environment Canada, 2015, Microbeads – a science summary, Can. Gazette I, 149
  5. European Parliament and the Council, 2015, Directive (EU) 2015/ 720 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 amending Directive 94/62/EC as regards reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags, Off. J. Eur. Union, L115
  6. European Parliament, Council of the European Union, 2008, Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008, Off. J. Eur. Union
  7. European Union, 2009, Regulation (EC) no 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products, Off. J. Eur. Union, L(342)
  8. Fela, 2014, Dutch lead EU in microbead ban, Front. Ecol. Environ., 12, 541
  9. Government of Canada, 2017, Microbeads in toiletries regulations registration SOR/2017-111, Can. Gazette II, 151, 1349
  10. Parker, 2018, We made plastic. We depend on it. Now we’re drowning in it, Natl. Geogr., 233, 40
  11. Republic of South Korea, 2017. Proposed amendments to the “Regulation on Quasi-drug Approval, Notification and Review” (7 pages, in Korean).
  12. Zacharopopoulou, 2012, Nanotechnology in cosmetology, Epitheorese Klin. Farmakol. Farmakokinet., 30, 51
  13. Zhang, 2020, You are what you eat: microplastics are identified in feces of male young adults living in Beijing, SSRN Electron. J.

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Anagnosti, L., Varvaresou, A., Pavlou, P., Protopapa, E., & Carayanni, V.
Venue
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
162
Pages
111883
ISSN
0025-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112706572
Cited by
281
References
116
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Worldwide actions against plastic pollution from microbeads and microplastics in cosmetics focusing on European policies. Has the issue been handled effectively? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111883
The paper
Anagnosti, L., Varvaresou, A., Pavlou, P., Protopapa, E., & Carayanni, V. (2021). Worldwide actions against plastic pollution from microbeads and microplastics in cosmetics focusing on European policies. Has the issue been handled effectively? Marine Pollution Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111883

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.