The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of dissimilar Al–Cu joints produced by friction stir welding
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the Al/Cu interface, the IMC layer adjacent to the Al side is the Al2Cu phase, the middle layer is the AlCu phase, and the layer adjacent to the Cu side is the Al4Cu9 phase.
“For each layer of IMC, it can be inferred that the IMC layer adjacent to the Al side (point A) is the Al 2 Cu phase, the middle layer (point B) is the AlCu phase, and the layer adjacent to the Cu side (point C) is the Al 4 Cu 9 phase.”
From Effect of Ultrasound on Microstructure and Properties of Aluminum–Copper Friction Stir Lap Welding (2024) · cites this paper as Tan et al. [37]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Fazel-Najafabadi, 2011, Dissimilar lap joining of 304 stainless steel to CP-Ti employing friction stir welding, Mater Des, 32, 1824, 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.12.026 · DOI
- Simoncini, 2012, Effect of the welding parameters and tool configuration on micro- and macro-mechanical properties of similar and dissimilar FSWed joints in AA5754 and AZ31 thin sheets, Mater Des, 41, 50, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.057 · DOI
- Bang, 2012, Gas tungsten arc welding assisted hybrid friction stir welding of dissimilar materials Al6061-T6 aluminum alloy and STS 304 stainless steel, Mater Des, 37, 48, 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.018 · DOI
- Ji, 2012, Reliability studies of Cu/Al joints brazed with Zn–Al–Ce filler metals, Mater Des, 42, 156, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.028 · DOI
- Honarpisheh, 2012, Investigation of annealing treatment on the interfacial properties of explosive-welded Al/Cu/Al multilayer, Mater Des, 37, 122, 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.045 · DOI
- Sedighi, 2012, Experimental study of through-depth residual stress in explosive welded Al–Cu–Al multilayer, Mater Des, 37, 577, 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.022 · DOI
- Mai, 2004, Characterisation of dissimilar joints in laser welding of steel–kovar, copper–steel and copper–aluminum, Mater Sci Eng A, 374, 224, 10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.025 · DOI · Paper page
- Mozhaiskaya, 1990, Structure and properties of welded aluminum–copper joints, Met Sci Heat Treat, 32, 938, 10.1007/BF00700088 · DOI
- Abbasi, 2001, Growth rate of intermetallic compounds in Al/Cu bimetal produced by cold roll welding process, J Alloy Compd, 319, 233, 10.1016/S0925-8388(01)00872-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Sheng, 2011, Influence of heat treatment on interface of Cu/Al bimetal composite fabricated by cold rolling, Composites: Part B, 42, 1468, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.045 · DOI · Paper page
- Xia, 2008, Microstructure and phase constitution near the interface of Cu/Al vacuum brazing using Al–Si filler metal, Vacuum, 82, 799, 10.1016/j.vacuum.2007.11.007 · DOI
- Eslami, 2011, An investigation on diffusion bonding of aluminum to copper using equal channel angular extrusion process, Mater Lett, 65, 1862, 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.03.053 · DOI
- Asemabadi, 2012, Investigation of cold rolling influence on the mechanical properties of explosive-welded Al/Cu bimetal, Mater Sci Eng A, 558, 144, 10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.102 · DOI
- Chen, 2013, Atomic diffusion behavior in Cu–Al explosive welding process, J Appl Phys, 113, 044901, 10.1063/1.4775788 · DOI
- Lee, 2005, Effects of intermetallic compound on the electrical and mechanical properties of friction welded Cu/Al bimetallic joints during annealing, J Alloy Compd, 390, 212, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.07.057 · DOI · Paper page
- Sahin, 2010, Joining of aluminum and copper materials with friction welding, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 49, 527, 10.1007/s00170-009-2443-7 · DOI
- Wanjara, 2011, Linear friction welding of Al–Cu: Part 1-Process evaluation, Can Metall Quart, 50, 350, 10.1179/000844311X13112418194644 · DOI
- Dalgaard, 2011, Linear friction welding of Al–Cu: Part 2-Interfacial characteristics, Can Metall Quart, 50, 360, 10.1179/000844311X13112418194671 · DOI · Paper page
- Murr, 1998, Intercalation vortices and related microstructural features in the friction-stir welding of dissimilar metal, Mater Res Innov, 2, 150, 10.1007/s100190050078 · DOI
- Ouyang, 2006, Microstructural evolution in the friction stir welded 6061 aluminum alloy (T6-temper condition) to copper, J Mater Process Technol, 172, 110, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.013 · DOI · Paper page
- Abdollah-zadeh, 2008, Microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir welded aluminum/copper lap joints, J Alloy Compd, 460, 535, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.06.009 · DOI
- Saeid, 2010, Weldability and mechanical properties of dissimilar aluminum–copper lap joints made by friction stir welding, J Alloy Compd, 490, 652, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.127 · DOI
- Xue, 2010, Enhanced mechanical properties of friction stir welded dissimilar Al–Cu joint by intermetallic compounds, Mater Sci Eng A, 527, 5723, 10.1016/j.msea.2010.05.061 · DOI
- Xue, 2011, Effect of friction stir welding parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the dissimilar Al–Cu joints, Mater Sci Eng A, 528, 4683, 10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.067 · DOI
- Galvão, 2010, Material flow in heterogeneous friction stir welding of aluminum and copper thin sheets, Sci Technol Weld Joining, 15, 654, 10.1179/136217110X12785889550109 · DOI
- Galvão, 2011, Formation and distribution of brittle structures in friction stir welding of aluminum and copper: influence of process parameters, Sci Technol Weld Joining, 16, 681, 10.1179/1362171811Y.0000000057 · DOI · Paper page
- Galvão, 2012, Formation and distribution of brittle structures in friction stir welding of aluminum and copper: Influence of shoulder geometry, Intermetallics, 22, 122, 10.1016/j.intermet.2011.10.014 · DOI
- Galvão, 2012, Influence of tool offsetting on the structure and morphology of dissimilar aluminum to copper friction-stir welds, Metall Mater Trans A, 43, 5096, 10.1007/s11661-012-1351-x · DOI
- Galvão, 2012, Study of the welding conditions during similar and dissimilar aluminum and copper welding based on torque sensitivity analysis, Mater Des, 42, 259, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.058 · DOI
- Liu, 2011, Microstructural characterisation and mechanical properties of friction stir welded joints of aluminum alloy to copper, Sci Technol Weld Joining, 16, 92, 10.1179/1362171810Y.0000000007 · DOI
- Genevois, 2011, Interfacial reaction during friction stir welding of Al and Cu, Metall Mater Trans A, 42, 2290, 10.1007/s11661-011-0660-9 · DOI
- Bisadi, 2013, The influences of rotational and welding speeds on microstructures and mechanical properties of friction stir welded Al5083 and commercially pure copper sheets lap joints, Mater Des, 43, 80, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.029 · DOI
- Firouzdor, 2012, Al–Cu friction stir lap welding, Metall Mater Trans A, 43, 303, 10.1007/s11661-011-0822-9 · DOI
- Liu, 2008, Microstructure and XRD analysis of FSW joints for copper T2/aluminum 5A06 dissimilar materials, Mater Lett, 62, 4106, 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.06.004 · DOI
- Cui, 2008, Peroidical plastic flow pattern in friction stir processed Al–Mg alloy, Scripta Mater, 58, 1082, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.003 · DOI
- Xu, 2011, Material flow and core/multi-shell structures in a friction stir welded aluminum alloy with embedded copper markers, J Alloy Compd, 509, 8449, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.05.118 · DOI
- Chowdhury, 2010, Tensile properties of a friction stir welded magnesium alloy: Effect of pin tool thread orientation and weld pitch, Mater Sci Eng A, 527, 6064, 10.1016/j.msea.2010.06.012 · DOI
- ASM Handbooks. Alloy phase diagrams, Vol. 3. Materials Park (OH): ASM International; 2002.
- Singh, 2011, The microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded Al–Zn–Mg alloy in as welded and heat treated conditions, Mater Des, 32, 682, 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bakke, A. O., Arnberg, L., & Li, Y. (2021) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.140979 · Cited by 20
Effect of Ultrasound on Microstructure and Properties of Aluminum–Copper Friction Stir Lap Welding
Zhao, W., Zhu, Y., Liu, Z., Yi, X., Wang, J., Fu, A., Wang, F., & He, H. (2024) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met14101162 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, C. W., Jiang, Z. G., Li, L. Q., Chen, Y. B., & Chen, X. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, L.Q.
- Venue
- Materials & Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 466-473
- ISSN
- 0261-3069 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142664332
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 22.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Materials & Design (1980-2015) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Waterloo
- China Scholarship Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Metallurgy and Material Science
- Keywords
- dissimilar metal joining, aluminum-copper joints, friction stir welding, pure copper, traverse speed, weld nugget zone, intermetallic compounds, Al4Cu9, Al2Cu, hardness profile, tensile strength, flexural strength, microstructure evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review