The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cracking mechanism and susceptibility of laser melting deposited Inconel 738 superalloy
Open accessAbstract
Laser Melting Deposition (LMD) of Inconel 738 (IN738) superalloy is a promising process for the remanufacturing of gas turbines and aerospace engines, but the cracking has not been thoroughly understood and controlled. This paper conducts a comprehensive study on the cracking behavior by using optical microscope (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersion spectrum (EDS), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results indicate that liquation cracking which follows the penetration mechanism is the major origin to those cracks. Whereas, at the propagation stage, ductility-dip cracking (DDC) is an important supplement to liquation cracking, especially at the triple junction points of grain boundaries (GBs) or the bottom of already formed liquation cracks. The cracks are very sensitive to GB morphology, the long-straight GBs which result from higher heat input or unidirectional scanning strategy are very vulnerable to cracking. Moreover, GB oxidation always plays an important role in accelerating crack propagation, the local protection from the cladding head is not enough for the LMD of IN738. For these factors, the test specimens which are bidirectionally deposited in an Argon (Ar) chamber with lower heat input achieve better tensile strengthen reaching 1093 to 1116 MPa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent research and development status of laser cladding: A review
Zhu, L., Xue, P., Lan, Q., Meng, G., Ren, Y., Yang, Z., Xu, P., & Liu, Z. (2021) · Optics & Laser Technology · doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.106915 · Cited by 895
Alloys-by-design: Application to new superalloys for additive manufacturing
Tang, Y. T., Panwisawas, C., Ghoussoub, J. N., Gong, Y., Clark, J. W. G., Németh, A. A. N., McCartney, D. G., & Reed, R. C. (2021) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.023 · Cited by 678
Heat treatment for metal additive manufacturing
Laleh, M., Sadeghi, E., Revilla, R. I., Chao, Q., Haghdadi, N., Hughes, A. E., Xu, W., De Graeve, I., Qian, M., Gibson, I., et al. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101051 · Cited by 538
Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J. W., Wei, H. L., Lienert, T. J., Zhang, W., Kou, S., & DebRoy, T. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101153 · Cited by 267
Liu, C., Sun, Y., Wen, M., He, T., & Yu, J. (2020) · Journal of Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.03.049 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Chen, H., Xu, L., Xu, J., Ren, X., & Chen, X.
- Venue
- Materials & Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 183
- Pages
- 108105
- ISSN
- 0264-1275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2965365109
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cracking mechanism and susceptibility of laser melting deposited Inconel 738 superalloy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108105
- The paper
- Zhang, X., Chen, H., Xu, L., Xu, J., Ren, X., & Chen, X. (2019). Cracking mechanism and susceptibility of laser melting deposited Inconel 738 superalloy. Materials & Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.