The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mg bone implant: Features, developments and perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Mg and its alloys have been identified as promising bone implant materials owing to their natural degradability, good biocompatibility and favorable mechanical properties. Nevertheless, the too fast degradation rate usually results in a premature disintegration of mechanical integrity and local hydrogen accumulation, which limit their clinical bone repair application. In this work, the current research status regarding Mg bone implants was systematically reviewed. The relevant strategies to enhance the corrosion resistance, including purification, alloying treatment, surface coating and Mg-based metal matrix composite, are comprehensively discussed. The fabricating techniques for Mg bone implants are also presented. Particularly, laser additive manufacturing can fabricate customized shape and complex porous structure basing on its unique additive manufacturing concept. More importantly, it can achieve rapid heating and cooling due to the characteristics of high laser energy density and good controllability, thereby regulating the microstructure and performance. Furthermore, the current challenges and future research perspectives are put forward. This work aims to offer some meaningful guidelines for researchers on the future study of Mg bone implants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Ruan, Y. C., Yu, M. K., O'Laughlin, M., Wise, H., Chen, D., Tian, L., Shi, D., Wang, J., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4162 · Cited by 1,051
Cited by
Bone Tissue Engineering in the Treatment of Bone Defects
Xue, N., Ding, X., Huang, R., Jiang, R., Huang, H., Pan, X., Min, W., Chen, J., Duan, J.-A., Liu, P., et al. (2022) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph15070879 · Cited by 441
Scaffold degradation in bone tissue engineering: An overview
Tajvar, S., Hadjizadeh, A., & Samandari, S. S. (2023) · International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation · doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2023.105599 · Cited by 291
Biodegradable magnesium‐based biomaterials: An overview of challenges and opportunities
Amukarimi, S., & Mozafari, M. (2021) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.59 · Cited by 258
Design, printing, and engineering of regenerative biomaterials for personalized bone healthcare
Jia, Z., Xu, X., Zhu, D., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101072 · Cited by 176
Metabolic regulation by biomaterials in osteoblast
Kang, Z., Wu, B., Zhang, L., Liang, X., Guo, D., Yuan, S., & Xie, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1184463 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Y., He, C., Dianyu, E., Yang, W., Qi, F., Xie, D., Shen, L., Peng, S., & Shuai, C.
- Venue
- Materials & Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 185
- Pages
- 108259
- ISSN
- 0264-1275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2979831381
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mg bone implant: Features, developments and perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108259
- The paper
- Yang, Y., He, C., Dianyu, E., Yang, W., Qi, F., Xie, D., Shen, L., Peng, S., & Shuai, C. (2020). Mg bone implant: Features, developments and perspectives. Materials & Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.