The DOI matches its Crossref record; 179 of the 179 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Osteoimmunomodulation for the development of advanced bone biomaterials
Open accessAbstract
As direct effector cells for osteogenesis, osteoblastic cells are commonly used for evaluating the in vitro osteogenic capacity of bone biomaterials, and the traditional biological principle for developing bone biomaterials is to directly stimulate osteogenic differentiation. With this principle, most efforts are currently spent on optimizing the bio-mechanical and physicochemical properties to induce osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. This strategy has achieved certain success in the development of bone biomaterials; however, inconsistencies between in vitro and in vivo studies are not uncommon, implying the mechanisms that govern the material's capacity to mediate osteogenesis is not well-understood. Osteoimmunology has revealed the vital role of immune cells in regulating bone dynamics. Neglecting the importance of the immune response is a major shortcoming of the traditional strategy, and may explain inconsistencies between in vitro and in vivo conditions. Here, we proposed osteoimmunomodulation (OIM) in recognition of the importance of the immune response during biomaterial-mediated osteogenesis. Accordingly, we proposed the paradigm shift of bone biomaterials to an osteoimmunomodulatory material and discussed the evaluation strategy for the osteoimmunomodulation property of bone biomaterials. It is the ambition of authors that this review will change traditional methods for bone biomaterials assessment and assist in developing new bone biomaterials with the osteoimmunomodulatory property for orthopedic and dental applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors
Kawai, T., & Akira, S. (2010) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.1863 · Cited by 9,304
Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M., & Edwards, J. P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2448 · Cited by 9,144
Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface
Nel, A. E., Mädler, L., Velegol, D., Xia, T., Hoek, E. M. V., Somasundaran, P., Klaessig, F., Castranova, V., & Thompson, M. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2442 · Cited by 7,083
Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis
Karageorgiou, V., & Kaplan, D. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 · Cited by 6,622
Foreign body reaction to biomaterials
Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A., & Chang, D. T. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 · Cited by 5,138
Vascular endothelial growth factor induced by hypoxia may mediate hypoxia-initiated angiogenesis
Shweiki, D., Itin, A., Soffer, D., & Keshet, E. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/359843a0 · Cited by 4,617
Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: A review
Staiger, M. P., Pietak, A. M., Huadmai, J., & Dias, G. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003 · Cited by 4,452
M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm
Mills, C. D., Kincaid, K., Alt, J. M., Heilman, M. J., & Hill, A. M. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166 · Cited by 3,287
Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages
Aderem, A., & Underhill, D. M. (1999) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.593 · Cited by 2,854
The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder
Dalby, M. J., Gadegaard, N., Tare, R., Andar, A., Riehle, M. O., Herzyk, P., Wilkinson, C. D. W., & Oreffo, R. O. C. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2013 · Cited by 2,416
Cited by
Biodegradable magnesium-based implants in orthopedics-a general review and perspectives
Wang, J., Xu, J., Hopkins, C., Chow, D. H., & Qin, L. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201902443 · Cited by 574
Current Advances in Immunomodulatory Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Lee, J., Byun, H., Madhurakkat Perikamana, S. K., Lee, S., & Shin, H. (2019) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201801106 · Cited by 452
Qiao, W., Wong, K. H. M., Shen, J., Wang, W., Wu, J., Li, J., Lin, Z., Chen, Z., Matinlinna, J. P., Zheng, Y., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23005-2 · Cited by 396
Self-citationWang, Y., Wang, J., Gao, R., Liu, X., Feng, Z., Zhang, C., Huang, P., Dong, A., Kong, D., & Wang, W. (2022) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121538 · Cited by 268
Bai, L., Du, Z., Du, J., Yao, W., Zhang, J., Weng, Z., Liu, S., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., et al. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.02.010 · Cited by 265
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z., Klein, T., Murray, R. Z., Crawford, R., Chang, J., Wu, C., & Xiao, Y.
- Venue
- Materials Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 304-321
- ISSN
- 1369-7021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2194806179
- Cited by
- 730
- References
- 179
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Osteoimmunomodulation for the development of advanced bone biomaterials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.004
- The paper
- Chen, Z., Klein, T., Murray, R. Z., Crawford, R., Chang, J., Wu, C., & Xiao, Y. (2016). Osteoimmunomodulation for the development of advanced bone biomaterials. Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
