Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomimetic glycopeptide hydrogel coated PCL/nHA scaffold for enhanced cranial bone regeneration via macrophage M2 polarization-induced osteo-immunomodulation

Wang, Yaping, Wang, Jingrong, Gao, Rui, Liu, Xiang, Feng, Zujian, Zhang, Chuangnian, Huang, Pingsheng, Dong, Anjie, Kong, Deling, Wang, Weiwei·2022·Biomaterials

Abstract

The reconstruction of large cranial bone defects by bioactive materials without exogenous cells or growth factors remains a substantial clinical challenge. Here, synthetic fibrous glycopeptide hydrogel (GRgel) self-assembled by β-sheet RADA16-grafted glucomannan was designed to mimic the glycoprotein composition and the fibrillar architecture of natural extracellular matrix (ECM), which was non-covalently composited with 3D-printed polycaprolactone/nano hydroxyapatite (PCL/nHA) scaffold for cranial bone regeneration. The glycopeptide hydrogel significantly promoted the proliferation, osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), which was further augmented by GRgel-induced macrophage M2-phonotype polarization and the effective M2 macrophage-BMSC crosstalk. The repair of critical-size skull bone defect in rat indicated a superior efficacy of PCL/nHA@GRgel implant on bone regeneration and osseointegration, with an average bone area of 83.3% throughout the defect location at 12 weeks post treatment. Furthermore, the osteo-immunomodulatory GRgel induced a reparative microenvironment similar with that in normal cranium, as characterized by an increased percentage of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages and osteoblasts, and high-level vascularization. Collectively, the composite scaffold developed here with macrophage polarization-mediated osteo-immunomodulation may represent a promising implant for expediting in situ bone regeneration by providing biochemical and osteoinductive cues at the injured tissue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121538

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Wang, J., Gao, R., Liu, X., Feng, Z., Zhang, C., Huang, P., Dong, A., Kong, D., & Wang, W.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
285
Pages
121538
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224657282
Cited by
268
References
49
FWCI
15.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomimetic glycopeptide hydrogel coated PCL/nHA scaffold for enhanced cranial bone regeneration via macrophage M2 polarization-induced osteo-immunomodulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121538
The paper
Wang, Y., Wang, J., Gao, R., Liu, X., Feng, Z., Zhang, C., Huang, P., Dong, A., Kong, D., & Wang, W. (2022). Biomimetic glycopeptide hydrogel coated PCL/nHA scaffold for enhanced cranial bone regeneration via macrophage M2 polarization-induced osteo-immunomodulation. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121538

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.