Cited by 49Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiology practices and educationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Implementing Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in the Radiology Workflow: Challenges and Considerations

Open access
Korfiatis, Panagiotis, Kline, Timothy L., Meyer, Holly M., Khalid, Sana, Leiner, Timothy, Loufek, Brenna T., Blezek, Daniel, Vidal, David E. +8 more·2025·Mayo Clinic Proceedings Digital Health

Abstract

Integration of AI-enabled algorithms into the radiology workflow presents a complex array of challenges that span operational, technical, clinical, and regulatory domains. Successfully overcoming these hurdles requires a multifaceted approach, including strategic planning, educational initiatives, and careful consideration of the practical implications for radiologists' workloads. Institutions must navigate these challenges with a clear understanding of the potential benefits and limitations of both vended and in-house developed AI tools.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.100188

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-enabled medical devices 2023. FDA https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-aiml-enabled-medical-devices PMC11791695 39680415

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korfiatis, P., Kline, T. L., Meyer, H. M., Khalid, S., Leiner, T., Loufek, B. T., Blezek, D., Vidal, D. E., Hartman, R. P., Joppa, L. J., Missert, A. D., Potretzke, T. A., Taubel, J. P., Tjelta, J. A., Callstrom, M. R., & Williamson, E. E.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Williamson, Eric E.
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Digital Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
100188
ISSN
2949-7612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405526581
Cited by
46
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings Digital Health (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
artificial intelligence in radiology, radiology workflow, AI implementation challenges, radiologist workload, clinical implementation of AI, AI regulation, radiologist education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review