Cited by 29Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingRadiology practices and education

Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Opportunities and Challenges

Flory, Marta N., Napel, Sandy, Tsai, Emily B.·2024·Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI

Abstract

Artificial intelligence's (AI) emergence in radiology elicits both excitement and uncertainty. AI holds promise for improving radiology with regards to clinical practice, education, and research opportunities. Yet, AI systems are trained on select datasets that can contain bias and inaccuracies. Radiologists must understand these limitations and engage with AI developers at every step of the process - from algorithm initiation and design to development and implementation - to maximize benefit and minimize harm that can be enabled by this technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.sult.2024.02.004

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flory, M. N., Napel, S., & Tsai, E. B.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Tsai, Emily B.
Venue
Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
152-160
ISSN
0887-2171 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392112467
Cited by
29
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, radiology, AI implementation, algorithmic bias, training data quality, clinical practice, radiology education, artificial intelligence research
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Radiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review