Cited by 24Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationAdvanced Measurement and Metrology TechniquesAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques

Traceability and uncertainty analysis in volume measurements

Lorefice, S.·2009·Measurement

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.measurement.2009.07.016

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lorefice, S.
Affiliations
Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (IT)
Corresponding author
Lorefice, S.
Venue
Measurement
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
42
Issue
10
Pages
1510-1515
ISSN
0263-2241 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964580009
Cited by
24
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (IRIS Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Keywords
measurement traceability, measurement uncertainty, volume measurement, glassware calibration, gravimetric calibration, uncertainty budget, key comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review