Cited by 13Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Glycemic changes during menstrual cycles in women with type 1 diabetes

Herranz, Lucrecia, Saez-de-Ibarra, Lourdes, Hillman, Natalia, Gaspar, Ruth, Pallardo, Luis Felipe·2016·Medicina Clínica (English Edition)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.medcle.2016.05.034

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herranz, L., Saez-de-Ibarra, L., Hillman, N., Gaspar, R., & Pallardo, L. F.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
Corresponding author
Herranz, Lucrecia
Venue
Medicina Clínica (English Edition)
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
146
Issue
7
Pages
287-291
ISSN
2387-0206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2750485813
Cited by
13
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Medicina Clínica (English Edition) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, menstrual cycle, luteal phase, glycemic variability, insulin dose, continuous glucose monitoring, women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review