Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Test–retest reliability of centre of foot pressure measures to assess postural control during unperturbed stance

Pinsault, Nicolas, Vuillerme, Nicolas·2009·Medical Engineering & Physics

Abstract

Centre of foot pressure (CoP) measures, computed from a force platform, are commonly used to assess individual's postural control during unperturbed stance. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the number of trial recordings on the test-retest reliability of CoP measures and to determine the optimum number of trial recordings required to maximise their test-retest reliability. Ten young healthy adults were asked to stand upright, eyes closed, as still as possible on a force platform allowing measuring the CoP displacements. Two sessions of ten 30s trials were performed with 1h rest in between. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval and Bland and Altman analysis were used as statistical method for assessing test-retest reliability of CoP measures. These analyses were conducted on both (1) non-normalized CoP measures and (2) CoP measures normalized relative to the subjects' anthropometric properties (height, weight and body mass index). Results show that ICCs generally increase as the number of trials used to compute CoP measures increases. Interestingly, three 30s trial recordings are sufficient to ensure excellent test-retest reliability of 12 CoP measures widely employed in clinical practice, namely two-dimensional CoP parameters (surface area, range, mean and maximal velocities of the CoP displacements) and one-dimensional mediolateral and anteroposterior CoP parameters (variance, range, mean and maximal velocities). The present findings could have implications in clinical and rehabilitative areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.08.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Pinsault, N., & Vuillerme, N.
Venue
Medical Engineering & Physics
Published
2008-10-04
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
276-286
ISSN
  • 1350-4533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-4030
OpenAlex
W2035588733
Cited by
234
References
3
FWCI
23.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Test–retest reliability of centre of foot pressure measures to assess postural control during unperturbed stance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.08.003
The paper
Pinsault, N., & Vuillerme, N. (2009). Test–retest reliability of centre of foot pressure measures to assess postural control during unperturbed stance. Medical Engineering & Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.08.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.