Cited by 177Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Fiber tract-oriented statistics for quantitative diffusion tensor MRI analysis

COROUGE, I, FLETCHER, P, JOSHI, S, GOUTTARD, S, GERIG, G·2006·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Quantitative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has become the major imaging modality to study properties of white matter and the geometry of fiber tracts of the human brain. Clinical studies mostly focus on regional statistics of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) derived from tensors. Existing analysis techniques do not sufficiently take into account that the measurements are tensors, and thus require proper interpolation and statistics of tensors, and that regions of interest are fiber tracts with complex spatial geometry. We propose a new framework for quantitative tract-oriented DTI analysis that systematically includes tensor interpolation and averaging, using nonlinear Riemannian symmetric space. A new measure of tensor anisotropy, called geodesic anisotropy (GA) is applied and compared with FA. As a result, tracts of interest are represented by the geometry of the medial spine attributed with tensor statistics (average and variance) calculated within cross-sections. Feasibility of our approach is demonstrated on various fiber tracts of a single data set. A validation study, based on six repeated scans of the same subject, assesses the reproducibility of this new DTI data analysis framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2006.07.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most often, data are averaged across corresponding points along each streamline in the pathway, so data can be analyzed versus streamline arc length or other parameterization.

    “Most often, data are averaged across corresponding points along each streamline in the pathway, such that data can be analyzed (e.g., an along-tract or along-pathway plot) versus streamline arc length or other parameterization (Colby et al., 2012b; Corouge et al., 2006; Yeatman et al., 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
COROUGE, I., FLETCHER, P., JOSHI, S., GOUTTARD, S., & GERIG, G.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
COROUGE, I
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
786-798
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006006542
Cited by
177
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH064065, P50MH064065)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U54EB005149, P01EB002779)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (#HD03110, P30HD003110)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
diffusion tensor imaging, fiber tracts, tensor interpolation, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, white matter, reproducibility
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Computer Simulation, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Information Storage and Retrieval, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review