Cited by 43Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Mediastinal atlas creation from 3-D chest computed tomography images: Application to automated detection and station mapping of lymph nodes

Feuerstein, Marco, Glocker, Ben, Kitasaka, Takayuki, Nakamura, Yoshihiko, Iwano, Shingo, Mori, Kensaku·2012·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

One important aspect of lung cancer staging is the assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes in 3-D chest computed tomography (CT) images. In the current clinical routine this is done manually by analyzing the 3-D CT image slice by slice to find nodes, evaluate them quantitatively, and assign labels to them for describing the clinical and pathologic extent of metastases. In this paper we present a method to automate the process of lymph node detection and labeling by creation of a mediastinal average image and a novel lymph node atlas containing probability maps for mediastinal, aortic, and N1 nodes. Utilizing a fast deformable registration approach to match the atlas with CT images of new patients, our method can maintain an acceptable runtime. In comparison to previously published methods for mediastinal lymph node detection and labeling it also shows a good sensitivity and positive predictive value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2011.05.005

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feuerstein, M., Glocker, B., Kitasaka, T., Nakamura, Y., Iwano, S., & Mori, K.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Aichi Institute of Technology (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
63-74
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003644909
Cited by
43
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21103006)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
mediastinal lymph nodes, lymph node detection, lung cancer staging, deformable image registration, probability maps, aortic lymph nodes
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Humans, Lymph Nodes, Mediastinum, Models, Anatomic, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Sensitivity and Specificity, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review