Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Micro-Net: A unified model for segmentation of various objects in microscopy images

Open access
Raza, Shan E Ahmed, Cheung, Linda, Shaban, Muhammad, Graham, Simon, Epstein, David, Pelengaris, Stella, Khan, Michael, Rajpoot, Nasir M.·2019·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

HighlightsA unified deep learning framework for segmentation of objects (cell nuclei, cells, and multi‐cellular objects such as glandular structures) in two main types of microscopy images: fluorescence and histology.The proposed Micro‐Net is aimed at better object localization in the face of varying intensities and is robust to noise.Detailed experimentation & comparative evaluation on publicly available data sets and a new image dataset that is made public with this paper.Demonstration of robustness of the algorithm to high levels of noise. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available. ABSTRACT Object segmentation and structure localization are important steps in automated image analysis pipelines for microscopy images. We present a convolution neural network (CNN) based deep learning architecture for segmentation of objects in microscopy images. The proposed network can be used to segment cells, nuclei and glands in fluorescence microscopy and histology images after slight tuning of input parameters. The network trains at multiple resolutions of the input image, connects the intermediate layers for better localization and context and generates the output using multi‐resolution deconvolution filters. The extra convolutional layers which bypass the max‐pooling operation allow the network to train for variable input intensities and object size and make it robust to noisy data. We compare our results on publicly available data sets and show that the proposed network outperforms recent deep learning algorithms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2018.12.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Raza, S. E. A., Cheung, L., Shaban, M., Graham, S., Epstein, D., Pelengaris, S., Khan, M., & Rajpoot, N. M.
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
52
Pages
160-173
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2798643036
Cited by
259
References
3
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.