The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Micro-Net: A unified model for segmentation of various objects in microscopy images
Open accessAbstract
HighlightsA unified deep learning framework for segmentation of objects (cell nuclei, cells, and multi‐cellular objects such as glandular structures) in two main types of microscopy images: fluorescence and histology.The proposed Micro‐Net is aimed at better object localization in the face of varying intensities and is robust to noise.Detailed experimentation & comparative evaluation on publicly available data sets and a new image dataset that is made public with this paper.Demonstration of robustness of the algorithm to high levels of noise. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available. ABSTRACT Object segmentation and structure localization are important steps in automated image analysis pipelines for microscopy images. We present a convolution neural network (CNN) based deep learning architecture for segmentation of objects in microscopy images. The proposed network can be used to segment cells, nuclei and glands in fluorescence microscopy and histology images after slight tuning of input parameters. The network trains at multiple resolutions of the input image, connects the intermediate layers for better localization and context and generates the output using multi‐resolution deconvolution filters. The extra convolutional layers which bypass the max‐pooling operation allow the network to train for variable input intensities and object size and make it robust to noisy data. We compare our results on publicly available data sets and show that the proposed network outperforms recent deep learning algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Quantitative Image Analysis of Cellular Heterogeneity in Breast Tumors Complements Genomic Profiling
Yuan, Y., Failmezger, H., Rueda, O. M., Ali, H. R., Gräf, S., Chin, S.-F., Schwarz, R. F., Curtis, C., Dunning, M. J., Bardwell, H., et al. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3004330 · Cited by 426
Cited by
Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation
Stringer, C., Wang, T., Michaelos, M., & Pachitariu, M. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x · Cited by 4,369
Cellpose 2.0: how to train your own model
Pachitariu, M., & Stringer, C. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01663-4 · Cited by 1,381
Metadata
- Authors
- Raza, S. E. A., Cheung, L., Shaban, M., Graham, S., Epstein, D., Pelengaris, S., Khan, M., & Rajpoot, N. M.
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 160-173
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2798643036
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.