Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CS 2 -Net: Deep learning segmentation of curvilinear structures in medical imaging

Open access
Mou, Lei, Zhao, Yitian, Fu, Huazhu, Liu, Yonghuai, Cheng, Jun, Zheng, Yalin, Su, Pan, Yang, Jianlong, Chen, Li, Frangi, Alejandro F., Akiba, Masahiro, Liu, Jiang·2021·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Automated detection of curvilinear structures, e.g., blood vessels or nerve fibres, from medical and biomedical images is a crucial early step in automatic image interpretation associated to the management of many diseases. Precise measurement of the morphological changes of these curvilinear organ structures informs clinicians for understanding the mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of e.g. cardiovascular, kidney, eye, lung, and neurological conditions. In this work, we propose a generic and unified convolution neural network for the segmentation of curvilinear structures and illustrate in several 2D/3D medical imaging modalities. We introduce a new curvilinear structure segmentation network (CS2-Net), which includes a self-attention mechanism in the encoder and decoder to learn rich hierarchical representations of curvilinear structures. Two types of attention modules - spatial attention and channel attention - are utilized to enhance the inter-class discrimination and intra-class responsiveness, to further integrate local features with their global dependencies and normalization, adaptively. Furthermore, to facilitate the segmentation of curvilinear structures in medical images, we employ a 1×3 and a 3×1 convolutional kernel to capture boundary features. Besides, we extend the 2D attention mechanism to 3D to enhance the network's ability to aggregate depth information across different layers/slices. The proposed curvilinear structure segmentation network is thoroughly validated using both 2D and 3D images across six different imaging modalities. Experimental results across nine datasets show the proposed method generally outperforms other state-of-the-art algorithms in various metrics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2020.101874

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Mou, L., Zhao, Y., Fu, H., Liu, Y., Cheng, J., Zheng, Y., Su, P., Yang, J., Chen, L., Frangi, A. F., Akiba, M., & Liu, J.
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
67
Pages
101874
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094059395
Cited by
437
References
75
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CS 2 -Net: Deep learning segmentation of curvilinear structures in medical imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2020.101874
The paper
Mou, L., Zhao, Y., Fu, H., Liu, Y., Cheng, J., Zheng, Y., Su, P., Yang, J., Chen, L., Frangi, A. F., Akiba, M., & Liu, J. (2021). CS 2 -Net: Deep learning segmentation of curvilinear structures in medical imaging. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101874

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.