Cited by 56Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyTensor decomposition and applications

Identifying associations among genomic, proteomic and imaging biomarkers via adaptive sparse multi-view canonical correlation analysis

Open access
Du, Lei, Zhang, Jin, Liu, Fang, Wang, Huiai, Guo, Lei, Han, Junwei, Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, the Alzheimer’s·2021·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

To uncover the genetic underpinnings of brain disorders, brain imaging genomics usually jointly analyzes genetic variations and imaging measurements. Meanwhile, other biomarkers such as proteomic expressions can also carry valuable complementary information. Therefore, it is necessary yet challenging to investigate the underlying relationships among genetic variations, proteomic expressions, and neuroimaging measurements, which stands a chance of gaining new insights into the pathogenesis of brain disorders. Given multiple types of biomarkers, using sparse multi-view canonical correlation analysis (SMCCA) and its variants to identify the multi-way associations is straightforward. However, due to the gradient domination issue caused by the naive fusion of multiple SCCA objectives, SMCCA is suboptimal. In this paper, we proposed two adaptive SMCCA (AdaSMCCA) methods, i.e. the robustness-aware AdaSMCCA and the uncertainty-aware AdaSMCCA, to analyze the complicated associations among genetic, proteomic, and neuroimaging biomarkers. We also imposed a data-driven feature grouping penalty to the genetic data with aim to uncover the joint inheritance of neighboring genetic variations. An efficient optimization algorithm, which is guaranteed to converge, was provided. Using two state-of-the-art SMCCA as benchmarks, we evaluated robustness-aware AdaSMCCA and uncertainty-aware AdaSMCCA on both synthetic data and real neuroimaging, proteomics, and genetic data. Both proposed methods obtained higher associations and cleaner canonical weight profiles than comparison methods, indicating their promising capability for association identification and feature selection. In addition, the subsequent analysis showed that the identified biomarkers were related to Alzheimer's disease, demonstrating the power of our methods in identifying multi-way bi-multivariate associations among multiple heterogeneous biomarkers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2021.102003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du, L., Zhang, J., Liu, F., Wang, H., Guo, L., Han, J., & Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, T. A.
Affiliations
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Du, Lei
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
70
Pages
102003
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135491122
Cited by
56
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-08-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Shaanxi Province Natural Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Computational Mathematics › Tensor decomposition and applications
Keywords
genomic biomarkers, proteomic biomarkers, neuroimaging biomarkers, uncertainty-aware optimization, Alzheimer's disease, feature selection
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Biomarkers, Multivariate Analysis, Genomics, Proteomics, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review