Identifying associations among genomic, proteomic and imaging biomarkers via adaptive sparse multi-view canonical correlation analysis
Open accessAbstract
To uncover the genetic underpinnings of brain disorders, brain imaging genomics usually jointly analyzes genetic variations and imaging measurements. Meanwhile, other biomarkers such as proteomic expressions can also carry valuable complementary information. Therefore, it is necessary yet challenging to investigate the underlying relationships among genetic variations, proteomic expressions, and neuroimaging measurements, which stands a chance of gaining new insights into the pathogenesis of brain disorders. Given multiple types of biomarkers, using sparse multi-view canonical correlation analysis (SMCCA) and its variants to identify the multi-way associations is straightforward. However, due to the gradient domination issue caused by the naive fusion of multiple SCCA objectives, SMCCA is suboptimal. In this paper, we proposed two adaptive SMCCA (AdaSMCCA) methods, i.e. the robustness-aware AdaSMCCA and the uncertainty-aware AdaSMCCA, to analyze the complicated associations among genetic, proteomic, and neuroimaging biomarkers. We also imposed a data-driven feature grouping penalty to the genetic data with aim to uncover the joint inheritance of neighboring genetic variations. An efficient optimization algorithm, which is guaranteed to converge, was provided. Using two state-of-the-art SMCCA as benchmarks, we evaluated robustness-aware AdaSMCCA and uncertainty-aware AdaSMCCA on both synthetic data and real neuroimaging, proteomics, and genetic data. Both proposed methods obtained higher associations and cleaner canonical weight profiles than comparison methods, indicating their promising capability for association identification and feature selection. In addition, the subsequent analysis showed that the identified biomarkers were related to Alzheimer's disease, demonstrating the power of our methods in identifying multi-way bi-multivariate associations among multiple heterogeneous biomarkers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SCCA has revealed immune-related expression patterns in RNA-Seq datasets from specific brain regions, offering biologically interpretable insights into disease progression.
“For instance, SCCA has revealed immune-related expression patterns in RNA-Seq datasets from specific brain regions, offering biologically interpretable insights into disease progression279, 280, 281.”
From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [279]
Cites
2019 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures.
Alzheimer's Association (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.01.010 · Cited by 2,461 · see citing works
Non-coding variability at the APOE locus contributes to the Alzheimer’s risk
Zhou, X., Chen, Y., Mok, K. Y., Kwok, T. C. Y., Mok, V. C. T., Guo, Q., Ip, F. C., Chen, Y., Mullapudi, N., Initiative, A. D. N., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10945-z · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ren, F., Wei, J., Chen, Q., Hu, M., Yu, L., Mi, J., Zhou, X., Qin, D., Wu, J., & Wu, A. (2025) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2025.07.030 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Lei, B., Li, Y., Fu, W., Yang, P., Chen, S., Wang, T., Xiao, X., Niu, T., Fu, Y., Wang, S., et al. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103213 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Du, L., Zhang, J., Liu, F., Wang, H., Guo, L., Han, J., & Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Du, Lei
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 102003
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3135491122
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2021-08-01)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 318 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Medical Image Analysis (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Shaanxi Province Natural Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Computational Mathematics › Tensor decomposition and applications
- Keywords
- genomic biomarkers, proteomic biomarkers, neuroimaging biomarkers, uncertainty-aware optimization, Alzheimer's disease, feature selection
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Biomarkers, Multivariate Analysis, Genomics, Proteomics, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review