Cited by 9Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Turning brain MRI into diagnostic PET: 15O-water PET CBF synthesis from multi-contrast MRI via attention-based encoder–decoder networks

Open access
Hussein, Ramy, Shin, David, Zhao, Moss Y., Guo, Jia, Davidzon, Guido, Steinberg, Gary, Moseley, Michael, Zaharchuk, Greg·2024·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Accurate quantification of cerebral blood flow (CBF) is essential for the diagnosis and assessment of a wide range of neurological diseases. Positron emission tomography (PET) with radiolabeled water (15 O-water) is the gold-standard for the measurement of CBF in humans, however, it is not widely available due to its prohibitive costs and the use of short-lived radiopharmaceutical tracers that require onsite cyclotron production. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in contrast, is more accessible and does not involve ionizing radiation. This study presents a convolutional encoder-decoder network with attention mechanisms to predict the gold-standard 15 O-water PET CBF from multi-contrast MRI scans, thus eliminating the need for radioactive tracers. The model was trained and validated using 5-fold cross-validation in a group of 126 subjects consisting of healthy controls and cerebrovascular disease patients, all of whom underwent simultaneous 15 O-water PET/MRI. The results demonstrate that the model can successfully synthesize high-quality PET CBF measurements (with an average SSIM of 0.924 and PSNR of 38.8 dB) and is more accurate compared to concurrent and previous PET synthesis methods. We also demonstrate the clinical significance of the proposed algorithm by evaluating the agreement for identifying the vascular territories with impaired CBF. Such methods may enable more widespread and accurate CBF evaluation in larger cohorts who cannot undergo PET imaging due to radiation concerns, lack of access, or logistic challenges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2023.103072

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hussein, R., Shin, D., Zhao, M. Y., Guo, J., Davidzon, G., Steinberg, G., Moseley, M., & Zaharchuk, G.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Hussein, Ramy
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
93
Pages
103072
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390399664
Cited by
9
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (826254)
  • NIH
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Emory University
  • National Institute on Aging (P30 AG066515)
  • GE Healthcare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
15O-water PET, cerebral blood flow, multi-contrast MRI, vascular territories
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review