Unsupervised MR-to-CT Synthesis Using Structure-Constrained CycleGAN
Abstract
Synthesizing a CT image from an available MR image has recently emerged as a key goal in radiotherapy treatment planning for cancer patients. CycleGANs have achieved promising results on unsupervised MR-to-CT image synthesis; however, because they have no direct constraints between input and synthetic images, cycleGANs do not guarantee structural consistency between these two images. This means that anatomical geometry can be shifted in the synthetic CT images, clearly a highly undesirable outcome in the given application. In this paper, we propose a structure-constrained cycleGAN for unsupervised MR-to-CT synthesis by defining an extra structure-consistency loss based on the modality independent neighborhood descriptor. We also utilize a spectral normalization technique to stabilize the training process and a self-attention module to model the long-range spatial dependencies in the synthetic images. Results on unpaired brain and abdomen MR-to-CT image synthesis show that our method produces better synthetic CT images in both accuracy and visual quality as compared to other unsupervised synthesis methods. We also show that an approximate affine pre-registration for unpaired training data can improve synthesis results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Additional loss functions such as gradient consistency loss and structure-consistency loss have shown promising results for avoiding geometric distortions in MR-to-CT synthesis.
“To avoid geometric distortions, additional loss functions such as gradient consistency loss (Hiasa et al. 2018) and structure-consistency loss (Yang et al. 2020) have shown promising results.”
From Towards 2D/3D Registration of the Preoperative MRI to Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Images for Visualisation of Bone Defects (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al. 2020
Performing MR-to-CT synthesis through the naive CycleGAN often results in inconsistent structures between input and synthetic images.
“However, performing MR-to-CT synthesis through the naive CycleGAN often results in inconsistent structures between input and synthetic images.”
From Towards 2D/3D Registration of the Preoperative MRI to Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Images for Visualisation of Bone Defects (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al. 2020
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892 · see citing works
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602 · see citing works
Wang, X., Girshick, R., Gupta, A., & He, K. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00813 · Cited by 11,596 · see citing works
Improved training of Wasserstein GANs
Gulrajani, I., Ahmed, F., Arjovsky, M., Dumoulin, V., & Courville, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.00028 · Cited by 6,800 · see citing works
Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesis
Brock, A., Donahue, J., & Simonyan, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.11096 · Cited by 3,717 · see citing works
Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networks
Zhang, H., Goodfellow, I., Metaxas, D., & Odena, A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.08318 · Cited by 3,353 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, S., Zhou, X., Li, C., Wang, S., Li, Y., Tan, T., & Zheng, H. (2025) · Research · doi:10.34133/research.1029 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Ku, P.-C., Martin-Gomez, A., Gao, C., Grupp, R., Mears, S. C., & Armand, M. (2023) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization · doi:10.1080/21681163.2022.2152375 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“2018) and structure-consistency loss (Yang et al. 2020) have shown promising results.”
BackgroundResultHussein, R., Shin, D., Zhao, M. Y., Guo, J., Davidzon, G., Steinberg, G., Moseley, M., & Zaharchuk, G. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.103072 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, H., Sun, J., Carass, A., Zhao, C., Lee, J., Prince, J. L., & Xu, Z.
- Affiliations
- Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4249-4261
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W3048439504
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 15
- FWCI
- 7.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSFC (11971373, 11690011, U1811461, 61721002)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018AAA0102201)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- synthetic CT, unsupervised image translation, CycleGAN, spectral normalization, self-attention, unpaired training data, radiotherapy treatment planning
- MeSH terms
- Abdomen, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review