Cited by 204Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Unsupervised MR-to-CT Synthesis Using Structure-Constrained CycleGAN

Yang, Heran, Sun, Jian, Carass, Aaron, Zhao, Can, Lee, Junghoon, Prince, Jerry L., Xu, Zongben·2020·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

Synthesizing a CT image from an available MR image has recently emerged as a key goal in radiotherapy treatment planning for cancer patients. CycleGANs have achieved promising results on unsupervised MR-to-CT image synthesis; however, because they have no direct constraints between input and synthetic images, cycleGANs do not guarantee structural consistency between these two images. This means that anatomical geometry can be shifted in the synthetic CT images, clearly a highly undesirable outcome in the given application. In this paper, we propose a structure-constrained cycleGAN for unsupervised MR-to-CT synthesis by defining an extra structure-consistency loss based on the modality independent neighborhood descriptor. We also utilize a spectral normalization technique to stabilize the training process and a self-attention module to model the long-range spatial dependencies in the synthetic images. Results on unpaired brain and abdomen MR-to-CT image synthesis show that our method produces better synthetic CT images in both accuracy and visual quality as compared to other unsupervised synthesis methods. We also show that an approximate affine pre-registration for unpaired training data can improve synthesis results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2020.3015379

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, H., Sun, J., Carass, A., Zhao, C., Lee, J., Prince, J. L., & Xu, Z.
Affiliations
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2020-12
Volume
39
Issue
12
Pages
4249-4261
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W3048439504
Cited by
204
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 15
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NSFC (11971373, 11690011, U1811461, 61721002)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018AAA0102201)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
synthetic CT, unsupervised image translation, CycleGAN, spectral normalization, self-attention, unpaired training data, radiotherapy treatment planning
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review