Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a monovalent mRNA vaccine, ABO1020, in adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Hannawi, Suad, Wu, Xiao-Hong, Villalobos, Ralph Elvi, Burhan, Erlina, Lallaine Borra, Ma. Dovie, Gupta, Rakesh Kumar, Aquitania, Grace P., Ang, Blake Warren C., Mae A. Zabat, Gelza, Roa, Camilo C., Zoleta-De Jesus, Loreta, Yu, Dan-Dan, Wang, Meng, Wu, Yan, Song, Wen-Jie, Ying, Bo, Qin, Cheng-Feng·2024·Med

Abstract

Background ABO1020 is a monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Results from a phase 1 trial showed ABO1020 was safe and well tolerated, and phase 3 trials to evaluate the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of ABO1020 in healthy adults are urgently needed. Methods We conducted a multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial among healthy adults (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05636319). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 2 doses of ABO1020 (15 μg per dose) or placebo, administered 28 days apart. The primary endpoint was the vaccine efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 cases that occurred at least 14 days post-full vaccination. The second endpoint included the neutralizing antibody titers against Omicron BA.5 and XBB and safety assessments. Findings A total of 14,138 participants were randomly assigned to receive either vaccine or placebo (7,069 participants in each group). A total of 366 symptomatic COVID-19 cases were confirmed 14 days after the second dose among 93 participants in the ABO1020 group and 273 participants in the placebo group, yielding a vaccine efficacy of 66.18% (95% confidence interval: 57.21-73.27, p Conclusion ABO1020 was well tolerated and conferred 66.18% protection against symptomatic COVID-19 in adults. Funding National Key Research and Development Project of China, Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences from the CAMS, National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.medj.2024.06.013

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Wang, 2023, Alarming antibody evasion properties of rising SARS-COV-2 BQ and XBB subvariants, Cell, 186, 279, 10.1016/j.cell.2022.12.018 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chen, 2023, Neutralization against XBB.1 and XBB.1.5 after Omicron subvariants breakthrough infection or reinfection, Lancet Reg. Health. West. Pac., 33
  3. Uraki, 2023, Antiviral and bivalent vaccine efficacy against an omicron XBB.1.5 isolate, Lancet Infect. Dis., 23, 402, 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00070-1 · DOI
  4. Kurhade, 2023, Low neutralization of SARS-COV-2 Omicron BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1 and XBB.1 by parental mRNA vaccine or a BA.5 bivalent booster, Nat. Med., 29, 344, 10.1038/s41591-022-02162-x · DOI
  5. Hoffmann, 2023, Profound neutralization evasion and augmented host cell entry are hallmarks of the fast-spreading SARS-COV-2 lineage XBB.1.5, Cell. Mol. Immunol., 20, 419, 10.1038/s41423-023-00988-0 · DOI
  6. Miller, 2023, Substantial neutralization escape by SARS-COV-2 omicron variants BQ.1.1 and XBB.1, N. Engl. J. Med., 388, 662, 10.1056/NEJMc2214314 · DOI
  7. Tregoning, 2021, Progress of the COVID-19 vaccine effort: Viruses, vaccines and variants versus efficacy, effectiveness and escape, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 21, 626, 10.1038/s41577-021-00592-1 · DOI
  8. Regev-Yochay, 2022, Efficacy of a fourth dose of covid-19 mRNA vaccine against Omicron, N. Engl. J. Med., 386, 1377, 10.1056/NEJMc2202542 · DOI
  9. Wu, 2023, Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the mRNA vaccine CS-2034 as a heterologous booster versus homologous booster with BBIBP-CorV in adults aged ≥18 years: A randomised, double-blind, phase 2B trial, Lancet Infect. Dis., 23, 1020, 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00199-8 · DOI
  10. Kanokudom, 2022, Safety and immunogenicity of the third booster dose with inactivated, viral vector, and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in fully immunized healthy adults with inactivated vaccine, Vaccines, 10, 86, 10.3390/vaccines10010086 · DOI
  11. Hu, 2022, Effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines against severe illness in B.1.617.2 (delta) variant–infected patients in Jiangsu, China, Int. J. Infect. Dis., 116, 204, 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.030 · DOI
  12. Fu, 2022, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of inactivated vaccine to address COVID-19 pandemic in China: Evidence from Randomized Control Trials and real-world studies, Front. Public Health, 10, 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917732 · DOI
  13. Zuo, 2022, Heterologous immunization with inactivated vaccine followed by mRNA-booster elicits strong immunity against SARS-COV-2 Omicron variant, Nat. Commun., 13, 2670, 10.1038/s41467-022-30340-5 · DOI
  14. Yisimayi, 2024, Repeated Omicron exposures override ancestral SARS-CoV-2 immune imprinting, Nature, 625, 148, 10.1038/s41586-023-06753-7 · DOI
  15. Zhao, 2024, Neutralization of Omicron XBB.1 by booster vaccination with BA.4/5 monovalent mRNA vaccine, Cell Discov., 10, 7, 10.1038/s41421-023-00609-0 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Xia, 2022, Origin, virological features, immune evasion and intervention of SARS-COV-2 Omicron sublineages, Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther., 7, 241, 10.1038/s41392-022-01105-9 · DOI
  17. Pajon, 2022, SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant neutralization after mRNA-1273 booster vaccination, N. Engl. J. Med., 386, 1088, 10.1056/NEJMc2119912 · DOI
  18. Scheaffer, 2023, Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines increase breadth of neutralization and protect against the BA. 5 Omicron variant in mice, Nat. Med., 29, 247, 10.1038/s41591-022-02092-8 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Davis-Gardner, 2023, Neutralization against BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB from mRNA bivalent booster, N. Engl. J. Med., 388, 183, 10.1056/NEJMc2214293 · DOI
  20. Collier, 2021, Age-related immune response heterogeneity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BNT162b2, Nature, 596, 417, 10.1038/s41586-021-03739-1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ramasamy, 2021, Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial, Lancet, 396, 1979, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32466-1 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Liu, 2023, Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (RQ3013) given as the fourth booster following three doses of inactivated vaccines: A double-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 3b trial, eClinicalMedicine, 64, 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102231 · DOI
  23. Yue, 2023, ACE2 binding and antibody evasion in enhanced transmissibility of XBB.1.5, Lancet Infect. Dis., 23, 278, 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00010-5 · DOI
  24. Gao, 2023, Repeated vaccination of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dampens neutralizing antibodies against Omicron variants in breakthrough infection, Cell Res., 33, 258, 10.1038/s41422-023-00781-8 · DOI
  25. Bignucolo, 2021, Sex Disparities in Efficacy in COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Vaccines, 9, 825, 10.3390/vaccines9080825 · DOI
  26. Zhu, 2021, Is there a difference in the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine in males and females? - A systematic review and meta-analysis, Hum. Vaccines Immunother., 17, 4741, 10.1080/21645515.2021.1984135 · DOI
  27. Merad, 2022, The immunology and immunopathology of COVID-19, Science, 375, 1122, 10.1126/science.abm8108 · DOI
  28. Yang, 2023, Understanding the mechanisms for COVID-19 vaccine's protection against infection and severe disease, Expert Rev. Vaccines, 22, 186, 10.1080/14760584.2023.2174529 · DOI
  29. Lund, 2021, Scent of a vaccine, Science, 373, 397, 10.1126/science.abg9857 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Hannawi, S., Wu, X.-H., Villalobos, R. E., Burhan, E., Lallaine Borra, M. D., Gupta, R. K., Aquitania, G. P., Ang, B. W. C., Mae A. Zabat, G., Roa, C. C., Zoleta-De Jesus, L., Yu, D.-D., Wang, M., Wu, Y., Song, W.-J., Ying, B., & Qin, C.-F.
Venue
Med
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
1282-1292.e3
ISSN
2666-6340
Cited by
8
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a monovalent mRNA vaccine, ABO1020, in adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.medj.2024.06.013
The paper
Hannawi, S., Wu, X.-H., Villalobos, R. E., Burhan, E., Lallaine Borra, M. D., Gupta, R. K., Aquitania, G. P., Ang, B. W. C., Mae A. Zabat, G., Roa, C. C., Zoleta-De Jesus, L., Yu, D.-D., Wang, M., Wu, Y., Song, W.-J., Ying, B., & Qin, C.-F. (2024). Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a monovalent mRNA vaccine, ABO1020, in adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2024.06.013