Cited by 210Brain Tumor Detection and ClassificationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesAI in cancer detection

An expert system for brain tumor detection: Fuzzy C-means with super resolution and convolutional neural network with extreme learning machine

Open access
Özyurt, Fatih, Sert, Eser, Avcı, Derya·2020·Medical Hypotheses

Abstract

Super-resolution, which is one of the trend issues of recent times, increases the resolution of the images to higher levels. Increasing the resolution of a vital image in terms of the information it contains such as brain magnetic resonance image (MRI), makes the important information in the MRI image more visible and clearer. Thus, it is provided that the borders of the tumors in the related image are found more successfully. In this study, brain tumor detection based on fuzzy C-means with super-resolution and convolutional neural networks with extreme learning machine algorithms (SR-FCM-CNN) approach has been proposed. The aim of this study has been segmented the tumors in high performance by using Super Resolution Fuzzy-C-Means (SR-FCM) approach for tumor detection from brain MR images. Afterward, feature extraction and pretrained SqueezeNet architecture from convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures and classification process with extreme learning machine (ELM) were performed. In the experimental studies, it has been determined that brain tumors have been better segmented and removed using SR-FCM method. Using the SquezeeNet architecture, features were extracted from a smaller neural network model with fewer parameters. In the proposed method, 98.33% accuracy rate has been detected in the diagnosis of segmented brain tumors using SR-FCM. This rate is greater 10% than the rate of recognition of brain tumors segmented with fuzzy C-means (FCM) without SR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109433

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Özyurt, F., Sert, E., & Avcı, D.
Affiliations
  • Fırat University (TR)
  • Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (TR)
Corresponding author
Özyurt, Fatih
Venue
Medical Hypotheses
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
134
Pages
109433
ISSN
0306-9877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980671251
Cited by
210
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Hypotheses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace - FIRAT (Fırat University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
brain tumor detection, super-resolution, fuzzy c-means clustering, brain MRI segmentation, tumor segmentation, SqueezeNet, extreme learning machine, convolutional neural networks, feature extraction, expert systems
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Brain Neoplasms, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Expert Systems, Glioblastoma, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Software Design, Early Detection of Cancer, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review