Cited by 36Regulation of Appetite and ObesityBody Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Energy content of weight loss: kinetic features during voluntary caloric restriction.

Open access
Heymsfield, Steven B., Thomas, Diana, Martin, Corby K., Redman, Leanne M., Strauss, Boyd, Bosy-Westphal, Anja, Müller, Manfred J., Shen, Wei +1 more·2012·Metabolism

Abstract

The classic rule stating that restricting intake by 3500 kcal/wk will lead to a 1-lb/wk rate of weight loss has come under intense scrutiny. Generally not a component of most weight loss prediction models, the "early" rapid weight loss phase may represent a period during which the energy content of weight change (ΔEC/ΔW) is low and thus does not follow the classic "rule." The current study tested this hypothesis. Dynamic ΔEC/ΔW changes were examined in 23 Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy Study overweight men and women evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry during weight loss at treatment weeks 4 to 24. Changes from baseline in body energy content were estimated from fat and fat-free mass. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine if ΔEC/ΔW changed significantly over time. The evaluation was expanded with addition of the Kiel 13-week weight loss study of 75 obese men and women to test with adequate power if there are sex differences in ΔEC/ΔW. The analysis of variance CALERIE time effect was significant (P < .001), with post hoc tests indicating that ΔEC/ΔW (kilocalories per kilogram) increased significantly from week 4 (X ± SEM; 4, 858 ± 388) to 6 (6, 041 ± 376, P < .01) and changed insignificantly thereafter; ΔEC/ΔW was significantly larger for Kiel women (6, 804 ± 226) vs men (6, 119 ± 240, P < .05). Sex-specific dynamic relative changes in body composition and related ΔEC/ΔW occur with weight loss initiation that extend for 1 month or more. These observations provide new information for developing energy balance models and further define limitations of the 3500-kcal energy deficit → 1-lb weight loss rule.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.metabol.2011.11.012

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because adipose tissue in humans also contains a small amount of water and other cells, the actual in vivo energy content in 1 kg of adipose tissue is approximately 7,700 kcal.

    “However, because AT in humans also contains a small amount of water and other cells, the actual in vivo energy content in 1 kg of AT is approximately 7,700 kcal (Flatt, 1995; Heymsfield et al., 2012).”

    From Effect of Exercise Training on Fat Loss—Energetic Perspectives and the Role of Improved Adipose Tissue Function and Body Fat Distribution (2021) · cites this paper as Heymsfield et al., 2012

    The Discussion (page unavailable) gives 7,700 kcal/kg as the conventional value for the energy content of weight loss and says that value is approached in the later phase of weight loss. It does not identify 7,700 kcal as the energy content of 1 kg of adipose tissue or explain the figure by adipose tissue’s water and cellular content. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heymsfield, S. B., Thomas, D., Martin, C. K., Redman, L. M., Strauss, B., Bosy-Westphal, A., Müller, M. J., Shen, W., & Martin Nguyen, A.
Affiliations
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • Montclair State University (US)
  • Monash Medical Centre (AU)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Heymsfield, Steven B.
Venue
Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
937-943
ISSN
0026-0495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071452671
Cited by
36
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01dk042618-15, 5k23dk068052-04)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG020478, U01-AG20478)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23-DK-068052, R21DK066360, P30DK072476, P01-DK042618)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K99HD060762, R00HD060762)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
caloric restriction, energy balance, fat-free mass, fat mass, body composition, sex differences, weight loss kinetics, obesity, negative energy balance
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Weight Loss, Absorptiometry, Photon, Caloric Restriction, Adiposity, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review