Cited by 10Analytical chemistry methods developmentElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsIonic liquids properties and applications

Optimization of a methodology for speciation of arsenic, selenium and mercury in blood samples based on the deep eutectic solvent

Open access
Akramipour, Reza, Golpayegani, Mohammad Reza, Ghasemi, Mahmoud, Noori, Negar, Fattahi, Nazir·2019·MethodsX

Abstract

In this research, a new liquid phase microextraction based on the solidification of deep eutectic solvent (LPME–SDES) has been developed for the speciation of As(III), As(V), Se(IV), Se(VI), Hg(II) and organic mercury (R-Hg) in the blood of children prior to their analysis by iridium-modified tube electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS). •In this method, a green solvent consisting of Choline chloride and decanoic acid in the molar ratio of 1:2 was used as a green hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent for the extraction of complexed ions from real blood samples. •The DESs replace the toxic organic solvents apply for extraction and could be synthesize from cheap accessible chemicals. •Under the optimum conditions, the calibration graphs for As, Se and Hg were linear in the rage of 0.15–40, 0.05–5.0 and 0.30–60 μg l −1 , respectively and, the detection limit of As, Se and Hg were 0.05, 0.015 and 0.10 μg l −1 , respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mex.2019.09.018

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akramipour, R., Golpayegani, M. R., Ghasemi, M., Noori, N., & Fattahi, N.
Affiliations
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
  • Akramipour, Reza
  • Golpayegani, Mohammad Reza
  • Ghasemi, Mahmoud
  • Noori, Negar
  • Fattahi, Nazir
Venue
MethodsX
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019
Volume
6
Pages
2141-2147
ISSN
2215-0161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2974359723
Cited by
10
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MethodsX (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deputy for Research and Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
Keywords
arsenic speciation, selenium speciation, mercury speciation, blood samples, children, deep eutectic solvents, liquid-phase microextraction, choline chloride, capric acid, green solvents, graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, organic mercury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review