Cited by 73Probiotics and Fermented FoodsNatural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesGut microbiota and health

Evaluation of anti-diabetic attributes of Lactobacillus rhamnosus MTCC: 5957, Lactobacillus rhamnosus MTCC: 5897 and Lactobacillus fermentum MTCC: 5898 in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats

Yadav, Radha, Dey, Debpriyo Kumar, Vij, Rishika, Meena, Sunita, Kapila, Rajeev, Kapila, Suman·2018·Microbial Pathogenesis

Abstract

Interest in probiotics has grown significantly in the last decades due to their reported nutritional and health promoting effects. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic potential of probiotic fermented milk (PFM) prepared using three different probiotic strains i.e. Lactobacillus rhamnosus MTCC: 5957, Lactobacillus rhamnosus MTCC: 5897 and Lactobacillus fermentum MTCC: 5898; independently or in combination, for treating streptozotocin induced type-1 diabetes in male Wistar rats. Diabetic rats were fed with PFM preparations for 6 weeks and then analyzed for the various biochemical parameters associated. The results indicated that feeding of PFM significantly improved glucose metabolism (fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, serum insulin), serum inflammation status (tumor necrosis factor-α, and serum interleukin-6), oxidative stress (thiobarbituric acid reactive substance, catalase, superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activities in liver and kidney), serum lipid profile (total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglycerides) in diabetic rats. In addition, feeding of PFM has significantly reduced mRNA expression of pepck and g6pase genes that code the key enzymes of gluconeogenesis pathway. The results of this study showed that daily consumption of PFM can be effective in combating of type -1 diabetes and its complications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.10.015

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yadav, R., Dey, D. K., Vij, R., Meena, S., Kapila, R., & Kapila, S.
Affiliations
  • Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN)
  • National Dairy Research Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Kapila, Suman
Venue
Microbial Pathogenesis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
125
Pages
454-462
ISSN
0882-4010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896457958
Cited by
73
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microbial Pathogenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus fermentum, probiotic fermented milk, type 1 diabetes, streptozotocin-induced diabetes, glucose metabolism, HbA1c, insulin, inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid profile, gluconeogenesis, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, glucose-6-phosphatase, antidiabetic activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Chemical Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diet Therapy, Disease Models, Animal, Fermentation, Kidney, Liver, Milk, Treatment Outcome, Rats, Wistar, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review