Cited by 1,553Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management

Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities.

Open access
Ahmad, Farah, Ahmad, Iqbal, Khan, M.S.·2008·Microbiological Research

Abstract

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are known to influence plant growth by various direct or indirect mechanisms. In search of efficient PGPR strains with multiple activities, a total of 72 bacterial isolates belonging to Azotobacter, fluorescent Pseudomonas, Mesorhizobium and Bacillus were isolated from different rhizospheric soil and plant root nodules in the vicinity of Aligarh. These test isolates were biochemically characterized. These isolates were screened in vitro for their plant growth promoting traits like production of indoleacetic acid (IAA), ammonia (NH(3)), hydrogen cyanide (HCN), siderophore, phosphate solubilization and antifungal activity. More than 80% of the isolates of Azotobacter, fluorescent Pseudomonas and Mesorhizobium ciceri produced IAA, whereas only 20% of Bacillus isolates was IAA producer. Solubilization of phosphate was commonly detected in the isolates of Bacillus (80%) followed by Azotobacter (74.47%), Pseudomonas (55.56%) and Mesorhizobium (16.67%). All test isolates could produce ammonia but none of the isolates hydrolyzed chitin. Siderophore production and antifungal activity of these isolates except Mesorhizobium were exhibited by 10-12.77% isolates. HCN production was more common trait of Pseudomonas (88.89%) and Bacillus (50%). On the basis of multiple plant growth promoting activities, eleven bacterial isolates (seven Azotobacter, three Pseudomonas and one Bacillus) were evaluated for their quantitative IAA production, and broad-…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.micres.2006.04.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, F., Ahmad, I., & Khan, M. S.
Affiliations
Aligarh Muslim University (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Ahmad, Farah
  • Ahmad, Iqbal
Venue
Microbiological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
163
Issue
2
Pages
173-181
ISSN
0944-5013 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021835886
Cited by
1,553
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 150 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 136 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 110 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 57
FWCI
15.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbiological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Keywords
plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, rhizosphere bacteria, Azotobacter, fluorescent Pseudomonas, Mesorhizobium, Bacillus, indole-3-acetic acid production, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, hydrogen cyanide production, ammonia synthesis, antifungal activity, chitinase, root nodules, Aspergillus, Fusarium
MeSH terms
Ammonia, Antifungal Agents, Azotobacter, Bacillus, Bacteria, Hydrogen Cyanide, Indoleacetic Acids, Phosphates, Plant Growth Regulators, Pseudomonas, Soil Microbiology, Symbiosis, Siderophores, Cicer, Root Nodules, Plant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review