Cited by 533Extraction and Separation ProcessesGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisMining and Resource Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 241 of the 243 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a low-carbon society: A review of lithium resource availability, challenges and innovations in mining, extraction and recycling, and future perspectives

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106743

Cites

241 of 241 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 243 references

2 of the 243 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ezama, I., de los Hoyos, C., Cortesgoso, P., Braun, T., 2018. Direct extraction lithium processes: The challenges of spent brine disposal, tailings and mine waste conference 2018, AusIMM, Brisbane.
  2. Klein, K., Gaines, L., 2012. Reducing foreign lithium dependence through coproduction of lithium from geothermal brine. In: Lithium Use in Batteries: Demand and Supply Considerations, pp. 1–11.
  3. Market, J., Byrne, C., Robinson, D., Jeanneau, P., Rossiter, H., 2019. Downhole assays in Pilbara. In: The Proceedings of Iron Ore 2019, Perth, WA, pp. 372–392.
  4. Rio Tinto, 2018. Press release — Jadar Project fact sheet 2018. <https://www.riotinto.com/documents/RT_Jadar_factsheet_EN.pdf> (Accessed: September 21, 2019).
  5. Tiihonen, M., Haavanlammi, L., Kinnunen, S., Kolehmainen, E., 2019. Outotec lithium hydroxide process-a novel direct leach process for the production of battery grade lithium hydroxide monohydrate from calcined spodumene. In Proceedings of ALTA 2019. ALTA Metallurgical Services Perth, Australia.
  6. USGS, 2016. Mineral commodity summaries 2016: U.S. Geological Survey, 202 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/70140094. · DOI
  7. Vitolo, S., Cialdella, M.L., 1995. Silica separation from reinjection brines having different compositions at Moste Amiata geothermal plant. In: Proc. World Geothermal Congress, pp. 2463–2466.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 532

Metadata

Authors
Tabelin, C. B., Dallas, J., Casanova, S., Pelech, T., Bournival, G., Saydam, S., & Canbulat, I.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Tabelin, Carlito Baltazar
Venue
Minerals Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
163
Pages
106743
ISSN
0892-6875 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128488908
Cited by
533
References
243
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 22
FWCI
30.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Minerals Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Mining and Resource Management
Keywords
lithium, lithium mining, lithium recovery, lithium recycling, lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicles, renewable energy storage, low-carbon society, ferromanganese nodules, desalination brine, geothermal brine, coal fly ash, mining waste, space mining, material flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review