Cited by 24Mitochondrial Function and PathologyDNA Repair MechanismsMetabolism and Genetic Disorders

A p.R369G POLG2 mutation associated with adPEO and multiple mtDNA deletions causes decreased affinity between polymerase γ subunits

Open access
Craig, Kate, Young, Matthew J., Blakely, Emma L., Longley, Matthew J., Turnbull, Douglass M., Copeland, William C., Taylor, Robert W.·2012·Mitochondrion

Abstract

Human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymerase γ (pol γ) is the sole enzyme required to replicate and maintain the integrity of the mitochondrial genome. It comprises two subunits, a catalytic p140 subunit and a smaller p55 accessory subunit encoded by the POLG2 gene. We describe the molecular characterization of a potential dominant POLG2 mutation (p.R369G) in a patient with adPEO and multiple mtDNA deletions. Biochemical studies of the recombinant mutant p55 protein showed a reduced affinity to the pol γ p140 subunit, leading to impaired processivity of the holoenzyme complex but did not show sensitivity to N-ethylmalaimide (NEM) inhibition, inferring a novel disease mechanism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mito.2011.11.006

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craig, K., Young, M. J., Blakely, E. L., Longley, M. J., Turnbull, D. M., Copeland, W. C., & Taylor, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Robert W.
Venue
Mitochondrion
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
313-319
ISSN
1567-7249 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092875955
Cited by
24
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mitochondrion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust Programme (074454/Z/04/Z)
  • UK NHS Specialist Commissioners
  • NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES 065078)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Keywords
POLG2, chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia, mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma, protein-protein interaction, polymerase processivity, N-ethylmaleimide sensitivity, dominant mutations, disease mechanisms
MeSH terms
DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, DNA, Mitochondrial, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Protein Binding, Ophthalmoplegia, Chronic Progressive External, Sequence Deletion, Protein Subunits, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review