Cited by 87Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSocial Media in Health EducationCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Impact of social media on the academic performance of undergraduate medical students

Open access
Bhandarkar, Ajay M., Pandey, Arvind Kumar, Nayak, Ramya, Pujary, Kailesh, Kumar, Ashwini·2021·Medical Journal Armed Forces India

Abstract

Background Social media has become an integral part in the life of every individual in the 21st century. Social media addiction in the younger age group is a major problem. The objective of this study was to find a correlation between academic performance and social media use. Methods This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study conducted in a medical school over a period of 3 months (Nov 2018-Jan 2019), where 400 medical undergraduates who use social media participated in the study. Data collected from the questionnaire included the academic performance in terms of university examination marks, the duration of social media use per day and the social media addiction score. Data correlation was done using the Pearson's correlation factor. Results 41.5% of students used social media for upto 3 h per day. Whatsapp (98.25%) and Youtube (91.75%) were the most commonly used social media applications. 73.5% used social media to read health-related news, 71.5% used it to complete assignments and more than 50% used it for seminar preparation, test preparation and research-related purposes. Academic performance of female students was better than male students. There was a significantly higher use of social media among academically low-performing medical students compared with high-performing medical students. There was a weak negative correlation between academic performance and social media usage and a strong positive correlation between social media usage and the social media addiction score. Conclusions Social media has a negative impact on the academic performance of 21st-century undergraduate medical students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.10.021

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhandarkar, A. M., Pandey, A. K., Nayak, R., Pujary, K., & Kumar, A.
Affiliations
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Corresponding author
Bhandarkar, Ajay M.
Venue
Medical Journal Armed Forces India
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
77
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
S37-S41
ISSN
0377-1237 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126196964
Cited by
87
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 2
FWCI
18.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Journal Armed Forces India (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
social media use, academic performance, medical students, social media addiction, WhatsApp, YouTube, gender differences, medical education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review