Cited by 177Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSocial Media in Health EducationCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Gender variations in social media usage and academic performance among the students of University of Sharjah

Open access
Alnjadat, Rafi, Hmaidi, Malek M., Samha, Thamer E., Kilani, Mhd M., Hasswan, Ahmed M.·2019·Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Social media usage is considered one of the most common activities among university students that could impact their daily lives. There is a great variation of the level of this impact depending on gender and some other factors. The impact of social media usage on academic performance is not known. This study aims to evaluate gender differences amongst students at the University of Sharjah (UoS) for predicting the impact of social media usage on their academic performance. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 328 medical UoS students across all years of study. Social media usage was assessed by a self-administered questionnaire titled Social Media and Academic Performance of Students Questionnaire (SMAAPOS). This tool used a 4-point Linkert rating scale and contained two sections: a section for participants' demographics, year of study and time spent on social media and another section collected participants' views about the impact and addictiveness of social media. Chi-square test using SPSS (v 20) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of the 500 invitees, 328 students responded; a response rate of 66%. The respondents were 61% female and 39% male students. The average time spent on social media usage was reported as 2-3 h per day. Furthermore, males were more addicted to social media than females (49.6%) and (32%), respectively. Additionally, females' academic performance was more highly influenced by the usage of social media than that of males, although males were more addicted to social media networks. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a significant difference in the academic performance of medical students as influenced by social media usage. Medical educators are urged to frame guidelines for using social media for educational purposes that will help improve the academic performance of the students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.05.002

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]The Europa world of learning 2012 2012 Routledge London
  2. [8]Tayseer M. Zoghieb F. Alcheikh I. Awadallah M. Social network: academic and social impact on college students ASEE 2014 Zone I Conference [Internet] 2014 University of Bridgeport Abu Dhabi [cited 19 December 2018]. Available from: http://www.asee.org/documents/zones/zone1/2014/Student/PDFs/185.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alnjadat, R., Hmaidi, M. M., Samha, T. E., Kilani, M. M., & Hasswan, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Sharjah (AE)
Corresponding author
Alnjadat, Rafi
Venue
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
390-394
ISSN
1658-3612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950250898
Cited by
157
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1
FWCI
30.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Sharjah's Research Ethics Committee (REC-18-01-29-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
social media use, academic performance, gender differences, medical students, social media addiction, time spent on social media, University of Sharjah

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review