Cited by 46Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSocial Media in Health EducationSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Prevalence and Determinants of Social Media Addiction among Medical Students in a Selected University in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Open access
Alfaya, Mansour A., Abdullah, Naif Saud, Alshahrani, Najim Z., Alqahtani, Amar Abdullah A., Algethami, Mohammed R., Al Qahtani, Abdulelah Saeed Y., Aljunaid, Mohammed A., Alharbi, Faisal Turki G.·2023·Healthcare

Abstract

Social media addiction has become a serious public health concern due to its adverse psychological effects. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and determinants of social media addiction among medical students in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study was designed. Participants (n = 326) from King Khalid University in Saudi Arabia completed the sociodemographic information, patient health questionnaire-9 scale, and the generalized anxiety disorder-7 tool to measure explanatory variables. The Bergen social media addiction scale (BSMAS) was used to measure social media addiction. A multiple linear regression model was fitted to investigate the predictors of social media addiction. The prevalence of social media addiction among study participants was 55.2% (mean BSMAS score: 16.6). According to the adjusted linear regression, male students had higher social media addiction scores than their female counterparts (β = 4.52, p < 0.001). Students’ academic performance was negatively associated with social media addiction scores. Moreover, students with symptoms of depression (β = 1.85, p = 0.005) or anxiety (β = 2.79, p = 0.003) had a higher BSMAS score compared to their counterparts. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to identify the causal factors of social media addiction, which would assist intervention initiatives by policymakers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/healthcare11101370

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alfaya, M. A., Abdullah, N. S., Alshahrani, N. Z., Alqahtani, A. A. A., Algethami, M. R., Al Qahtani, A. S. Y., Aljunaid, M. A., & Alharbi, F. T. G.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Health (SA)
  • University of Jeddah (SA)
  • College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
  • Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA)
Corresponding author
  • Alfaya, Mansour A.
  • Alshahrani, Najim Z.
Venue
Healthcare
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-05-10
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
1370
ISSN
2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378515710
Cited by
46
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3
FWCI
19.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
social media addiction, medical students, prevalence, determinants, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, depression, anxiety, academic performance, sex differences, Saudi Arabia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review