Cited by 8Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

A case of breakthrough Candida parapsilosis fungemia during micafungin therapy for a Candida glabrata bloodstream infection

Open access
Norimatsu, Yuta, Morii, Daiichi, Kogure, Asako, Hamanaka, Taeko, Kuwano, Yoshihiro, Yokozawa, Takayuki, Oda, Toshimi·2017·Medical Mycology Case Reports

Abstract

We describe a case of breakthrough Candida parapsilosis fungemia in an 80-year-old woman with pyoderma gangrenosum and rheumatoid arthritis. C. parapsilosis was detected in blood culture while the patient was treated with micafungin for a Candida glabrata bloodstream infection. The breakthrough infection was successfully treated with liposomal amphotericin B.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mmcr.2017.03.002

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Norimatsu et al. reported that liposomal amphotericin B (3 mg/kg/day) showed better activity than micafungin in the treatment of both C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis bloodstream infections in an 80-year-old woman.

    “According to the findings reported by Norimatsu et al. [4], the liposomal AmB (3 mg/kg/day) showed better activity than micafungin in the treatment of both C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis bloodstream infections in the case of an 80-year-old woman.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norimatsu, Y., Morii, D., Kogure, A., Hamanaka, T., Kuwano, Y., Yokozawa, T., & Oda, T.
Affiliations
Showa General Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Norimatsu, Yuta
Venue
Medical Mycology Case Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
16
Pages
1-3
ISSN
2211-7539 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2602044155
Cited by
8
References
13
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Mycology Case Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, micafungin, antifungal resistance, bloodstream infection, pyoderma gangrenosum, rheumatoid arthritis, liposomal amphotericin B, elderly patients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review