Efficient identification of regulatory sequences in the chicken genome by a powerful combination of embryo electroporation and genome comparison
Open accessAbstract
Recently expanded knowledge of gene regulation clearly indicates that the regulatory sequences of a gene, usually identified as enhancers, are widely distributed in the gene locus, revising the classical view that they are clustered in the vicinity of genes. To identify regulatory sequences for Sox2 expression governing early neurogenesis, we scanned the 50-kb region of the chicken Sox2 locus for enhancer activity utilizing embryo electroporation, resulting in identification of a number of enhancers scattered throughout the analyzed genomic span. The 'pan-neural' Sox2 expression in early embryos is actually brought about by the composite activities of five separate enhancers with distinct spatio-temporal specificities. These and other functionally defined enhancers exactly correspond to extragenic sequence blocks that are conspicuously conserved between the chicken and mammalian genomes and that are embedded in sequences with a wide range of sequence conservation between humans and mice. The sequences conserved between amniotes and teleosts correspond to subregions of the enhancer subsets which presumably represent core motifs of the enhancers, and the limited conservation partly reflects divergent expression patterns of the gene. The phylogenic distance between the chicken and mammals appears optimal for identifying a battery of genetic regulatory elements as conserved sequence blocks, and chicken embryo electroporation facilitates functional characterization of these elements.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The gene deserts flanking DACH1, OTX2, and SOX2, all shown experimentally to harbor distal enhancers, are also rich in HCEs.
“The gene deserts flanking the developmental genes DACH1, OTX2, and SOX2, all of which have been shown experimentally to harbor distal enhancers (Nobrega et al. 2003;Kimura-Yoshida et al. 2004;Uchikawa et al. 2004), are also rich in HCEs.”
From Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes (2005) · cites this paper as Uchikawa et al. 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wood, H. B., & Episkopou, V. (1999) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00116-1 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Miles, C., Elgar, G., Coles, E., Kleinjan, D.J., van Heyningen, V., Hastie, N., 1998. Complete sequencing of the Fugu WAGR region from WT1 to PAX6: dramatic compaction and conservation of synteny with human chromosome 11p13. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13068-13072.
- Xu, Z.P., Saunders, G.F., 1998. PAX6 intronic sequence targets expression to the spinal cord. Dev. Genet. 23, 259-263.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes
Siepel, A., Bejerano, G., Pedersen, J. S., Hinrichs, A. S., Hou, M., Rosenbloom, K., Clawson, H., Spieth, J., Hillier, L. W., Richards, S., et al. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3715005 · Cited by 4,408 · see citing works
Neural induction: old problem, new findings, yet more questions
Stern, C. D. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01794 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Amaral, P. P., Neyt, C., Wilkins, S. J., Askarian-Amiri, M. E., Sunkin, S. M., Perkins, A. C., & Mattick, J. S. (2009) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.1705309 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Direct, Androgen Receptor-Mediated Regulation of the FKBP5 Gene via a Distal Enhancer Element
Magee, J. A., Chang, L.-W., Stormo, G. D., & Milbrandt, J. (2006) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2005-1001 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
- Authors
- Uchikawa, M., Takemoto, T., Kamachi, Y., & Kondoh, H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kondoh, Hisato
- Venue
- Mechanisms of Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1145-1158
- ISSN
- 0925-4773 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983867615
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Mechanisms of Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0040/2001-M)
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (12CE2007)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- regulatory elements, enhancers, SOX2, chicken genome, enhancer activity, early neurogenesis, sequence conservation, comparative genomics, gene expression regulation, spatiotemporal expression
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chick Embryo, Chickens, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Genome, Electroporation, Synteny
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review