Cited by 95Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Pseudo-phosphorylation of tau at Ser202 and Thr205 affects tau filament formation

Rankin, Carolyn A., Sun, Qian, Gamblin, T. Chris·2005·Molecular Brain Research

Abstract

The microtubule-associated protein tau aggregates into insoluble filaments in numerous neurodegenerative diseases, most common of which is Alzheimer's disease. Tau aggregation in Alzheimer's disease appears to follow a continuum from soluble monomer to an end point of insoluble extracellular tangles with a strong correlation between the amount of fibrillar tau and dementia. The phosphorylation of amino acids S202 and T205 in the tau molecule is recognized by the phosphorylation-specific monoclonal antibody, AT8, and has been observed by a number of researchers to be an early step in the progression of monomer to filaments. In addition, these amino acids are located in a proline-rich region containing a set of five phosphorylation sites (one being S202), that when phosphorylated, were reported to alter several properties of tau, including filament formation. Considering these observations, we have investigated the role of S202 and T205 phosphorylation in the in vitro polymerization of tau. Pseudo-phosphorylation mutants were constructed by site-directed mutagenesis in which amino acids S202 and T205 were changed to negatively charged glutamic acids mimicking post-translational phosphorylation. These pseudo-phosphorylated, mutant tau proteins were then assayed in vitro for changes in structure, polymerization into filaments, and microtubule binding. Phosphorylation at the AT8 site does not appear to influence either SDS-resistant structure nor microtubule binding. However, in r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.04.012

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rankin, C. A., Sun, Q., & Gamblin, T. C.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Rankin, Carolyn A.
Venue
Molecular Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
138
Issue
1
Pages
84-93
ISSN
0169-328X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018733438
Cited by
95
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p20rr015563-08)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG022428)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20 RR 15563)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
tau protein, AT8 antibody, proline-rich region, microtubule binding, tau aggregation, Alzheimer's disease, glutamic acid substitution
MeSH terms
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Phosphorylation, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Serine, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Threonine, Blotting, Western, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Arachidonic Acid, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review