Cited by 784Liver physiology and pathologyLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Landscape of Intercellular Crosstalk in Healthy and NASH Liver Revealed by Single-Cell Secretome Gene Analysis

Open access
Xiong, Xuelian, Kuang, Henry, Ansari, Sahar, Liu, Tongyu, Gong, Jianke, Wang, Shuai, Zhao, Xu-Yun, Ji, Yewei +22 more·2019·Molecular Cell

Abstract

Cell-cell communication via ligand-receptor signaling is a fundamental feature of complex organs. Despite this, the global landscape of intercellular signaling in mammalian liver has not been elucidated. Here we perform single-cell RNA sequencing on non-parenchymal cells isolated from healthy and NASH mouse livers. Secretome gene analysis revealed a highly connected network of intrahepatic signaling and disruption of vascular signaling in NASH. We uncovered the emergence of NASH-associated macrophages (NAMs), which are marked by high expression of triggering receptors expressed on myeloid cells 2 (Trem2), as a feature of mouse and human NASH that is linked to disease severity and highly responsive to pharmacological and dietary interventions. Finally, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) serve as a hub of intrahepatic signaling via HSC-derived stellakines and their responsiveness to vasoactive hormones. These results provide unprecedented insights into the landscape of intercellular crosstalk and reprogramming of liver cells in health and disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.028

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the context of MASLD and MASH, a progressive loss of KCs, where the degree of loss is correlated with the severity of the injury, has been reported.

    “In the context of MASLD and MASH, a progressive loss of KCs, where the degree of loss is correlated with the severity of the injury, has been reported (36, 37, 104–106, 108).”

    From Targeting macrophages in liver fibrosis (2026) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports a marked expansion of Kupffer cells in NASH livers, contrary to the claimed progressive loss. It associates Trem2 and Gpnmb expression—not the degree of KC loss—with liver injury and fibrosis. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LAMs, SAMs and NAMs exhibit a very similar transcriptional profile, with the precise name reflecting the different studies in which these cells were identified.

    “Notably, these cells exhibit a very similar transcriptional profile, with the precise name (LAM, SAM, or NAM) reflecting the different studies in which these cells were identified.”

    From Targeting macrophages in liver fibrosis (2026) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Results section, “Emergence of NASH-associated macrophage and its molecular signature” (page not supplied), identifies and names NAM and describes their Trem2, Gpnmb and Cd9 expression. It does not compare NAM with LAMs or SAMs or establish that the three names reflect different studies of cells with very similar transcriptional profiles. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Monocytes recruited to zones of steatosis and fibrosis appear to take on an alternative profile, which has been given multiple names, including lipid-associated macrophages (LAMs), scar-associated macrophages (SAMs) and NASH-associated macrophages (NAMs).

    “On the other hand, those monocytes recruited to zones of steatosis and fibrosis appear to take on an alternative profile, which has been given multiple names, including lipid-associated macrophages (LAMs), scar-associated macrophages (SAMs) and NASH-associated macrophages (NAMs) (31, 104, 108, 109).”

    From Targeting macrophages in liver fibrosis (2026) · cites this paper as [108]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The majority of murine studies suggest LAMs/LAM-like KCs play a role in tissue repair, contributing to dead cell and lipid clearance, reducing lipotoxic stress, and preventing uncontrolled inflammation.

    “While the majority of murine studies to date have suggested a role for LAMs/LAM-like KCs in tissue repair, contributing to dead cell and lipid clearance, thus reducing lipotoxic stress, and preventing uncontrolled inflammation (36, 108, 122–126)”

    From Targeting macrophages in liver fibrosis (2026) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that NASH-associated macrophages clear apoptotic and lipid-laden hepatocytes and likely serve an adaptive, protective role in diet-induced NASH. It does not establish that they reduce lipotoxic stress or prevent uncontrolled inflammation, or assess what the majority of murine studies conclude. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Macrophages in the fibrotic liver called LAMs, SAMs, and NAMs in different studies largely share a conserved transcriptional profile.

    “A good example of this is the population of macrophages in the fibrotic liver, which have been called LAMs, SAMs, and NAMs in different studies, despite largely sharing a conserved transcriptional profile (31, 104, 108).”

    From Targeting macrophages in liver fibrosis (2026) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Results section, “Emergence of NASH-associated macrophage and its molecular signature” (page unavailable), identifies a Trem2-high liver macrophage population in NASH and names it NAM, with a characteristic gene-expression profile. The paper does not establish that NAMs, LAMs, and SAMs largely share a conserved transcriptional profile across studies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 62 · Cited by 784

Authors
Xiong, X., Kuang, H., Ansari, S., Liu, T., Gong, J., Wang, S., Zhao, X.-Y., Ji, Y., Li, C., Guo, L., Zhou, L., Chen, Z., Leon-Mimila, P., Chung, M. T., Kurabayashi, K., Opp, J., Campos-Pérez, F., Villamil-Ramírez, H., Canizales-Quinteros, S., Lyons, R., Lumeng, C. N., Zhou, B., Qi, L., Huertas-Vazquez, A., Lusis, A. J., Xu, X. Z. S., Li, S., Yu, Y., Li, J. Z., & Lin, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Lin, Jiandie D.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
644-660.e5
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2968872536
Cited by
784
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
50.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  • Welch Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, cell-cell crosstalk, non-parenchymal liver cells, TREM2, hepatic stellate cells, vascular signaling, ligand-receptor signaling, liver disease severity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Communication, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Ligands, Liver, Macrophages, Signal Transduction, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Mice, Hepatic Stellate Cells, Single-Cell Analysis, Cellular Reprogramming, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review