The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic analysis of intrinsic enhancer-promoter compatibility in the mouse genome
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Gene expression is in part controlled by cis-regulatory elements (CREs) such as enhancers and repressive elements. Anecdotal evidence has indicated that a CRE and a promoter need to be biochemically compatible for promoter regulation to occur, but this compatibility has remained poorly characterized in mammalian cells. We used high-throughput combinatorial reporter assays to test thousands of CRE-promoter pairs from three Mb-sized genomic regions in mouse cells. This revealed that CREs vary substantially in their promoter compatibility, ranging from striking specificity to broad promiscuity. More than half of the tested CREs exhibit significant promoter selectivity. Housekeeping promoters tend to have similar CRE preferences, but other promoters exhibit a wide diversity of compatibilities. Higher-order transcription factors (TF) motif combinations may account for compatibility. CRE-promoter selectivity does not correlate with looping interactions in the native genomic context, suggesting that chromatin folding and compatibility are two orthogonal mechanisms that confer specificity to gene regulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Analysis of a number of enhancer-promoter pairs in the mouse genome has demonstrated that different enhancers show various levels of specificity, ranging from the ability to activate a wide range of promoters to highly specific activation of a particular promoter [136].”
From Enhancer Function in the 3D Genome (2023) · cites this paper as [136]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923 · Cited by 56,400
An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11247 · Cited by 18,072
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Ginestet, C. E. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2010.00676_9.x · Cited by 14,511
Heinz, S., Benner, C., Spann, N., Bertolino, E., Lin, Y. C., Laslo, P., Cheng, J. X., Murre, C., Singh, H., & Glass, C. K. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004 · Cited by 13,382
MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching
Bailey, T. L., Boden, M., Buske, F. A., Frith, M., Grant, C. E., Clementi, L., Ren, J., Li, W. W., & Noble, W. S. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp335 · Cited by 10,648
Landscape of transcription in human cells
Djebali, S., Davis, C. A., Merkel, A., Dobin, A., Lassmann, T., Mortazavi, A., Tanzer, A., Lagarde, J., Lin, W., Schlesinger, F., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11233 · Cited by 5,187
GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes
Frankish, A., Diekhans, M., Ferreira, A.-M., Johnson, R., Jungreis, I., Loveland, J. E., Mudge, J. M., Sisu, C., Wright, J. C., Armstrong, J. C., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky955 · Cited by 3,006
Snakemake—a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine
Köster, J., & Rahmann, S. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts480 · Cited by 2,780
An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues
The FANTOM Consortium, Andersson, R., Gebhard, C., Miguel-Escalada, I., Hoof, I., Bornholdt, J., Boyd, M., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., Schmidl, C., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12787 · Cited by 2,550
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Integration by parts: The multi-layered mechanisms of cis-regulatory control
Cornwall-Scoones, J., Briscoe, J., & Delàs, M. J. (2026) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2026.09.016
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinez-Ara, M., Comoglio, F., van Arensbergen, J., & van Steensel, B.
- Affiliations
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
- Corresponding author
- van Steensel, Bas
- Venue
- Molecular Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2519-2531.e6
- ISSN
- 1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9278412
- OpenAlex
- W4225797159
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 7.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (165206)
- KWF Kankerbestrijding
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- cis-regulatory elements, enhancers, promoter selectivity, transcription factor binding motifs, chromatin looping, chromatin folding, gene expression regulation, mouse genome
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Mammals, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Transcription Factors, Genome, Genomics, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review