Cited by 67

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Disease or Not a Disease? Aging As a Pathology

Gladyshev, Timothy V., Gladyshev, Vadim N.·2016·Trends in Molecular Medicine

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molmed.2016.09.009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some progeroid syndromes manifest signs of incomplete or segmental aging, as exemplified by the absence of a central nervous phenotype in HGPS.

    “some progeroid syndromes manifest signs of incomplete or segmental aging, as exemplified by the absence of a central nervous phenotype in HGPS.”

    From Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe (2023) · cites this paper as [300]

    The discussion under the Abstract heading (page unavailable) says that age-related dysfunctions can manifest differently and that deleterious changes follow loosely synchronized trajectories. This supports the general idea that signs of aging need not appear uniformly, but our copy does not discuss progeroid syndromes, HGPS, or the absence of a central nervous phenotype. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The distinction between 'normal' and 'pathological' aging is debatable.

    “the distinction between ' normal ' and ' pathological ' aging is debatable 300”

    From Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe (2023) · cites this paper as [300]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Haas, 2008, The worldwide epidemiology of prostate cancer: perspectives from autopsy studies, Can J. Urol., 15, 3866
  2. Kenyon, 2010, The genetics of ageing, Nature, 464, 504, 10.1038/nature08980 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Faragher, 2015, Should we treat aging as a disease? The consequences and dangers of miscategorisation, Front. Genet., 6, 171, 10.3389/fgene.2015.00171 · DOI
  4. Hayflick, 2004, Debates. The not-so-close relationship between biological aging and age-associated pathologies in humans, J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., 59, B547, 10.1093/gerona/59.6.B547 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Rattan, 2014, Aging is not a disease: implications for intervention, Aging Dis., 5, 196, 10.14336/AD.2014.0500196 · DOI
  6. Gems, 2015, The aging-disease false dichotomy: understanding senescence as pathology, Front. Genet., 6, 212, 10.3389/fgene.2015.00212 · DOI
  7. Gladyshev, 2016, Aging: progressive decline in fitness due to the rising deleteriome adjusted by genetic, environmental, and stochastic processes, Aging Cell, 15, 594, 10.1111/acel.12480 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gladyshev, T. V., & Gladyshev, V. N.
Venue
Trends in Molecular Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
995-996
ISSN
1471-4914
Cited by
67
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review